Search for: "Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company" Results 21 - 40 of 70
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2017, 10:48 pm by GJEL
A Minnesota labor union health care fund and individual consumers from around the US led the case against Takeda. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 4:13 pm by Norman Gregory Fernandez
Imagine spending $35,000 and a brand-new motorcycle from a company who then tells you to basically fuck off. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 4:13 pm by admin
Imagine spending $35,000 and a brand-new motorcycle from a company who then tells you to basically fuck off. [read post]
The landowner in Hawkes purchased wetlands in northern Minnesota, seeking to mine them for peat moss used in landscaping. [read post]
The landowner in Hawkes purchased wetlands in northern Minnesota, seeking to mine them for peat moss used in landscaping. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 4:31 pm by Michael B. Stack
Before this I was paying medical bills for a health insurance company. [read post]
29 May 2016, 10:13 pm by Bill Marler
Bad publicity may cause economic hardship on the restaurant or manufacturer. [read post]
17 May 2015, 6:28 am by Mark Summerfield
  The law of obviousness under the Patents Act 1952 was originally messed up by the High Court in the ‘3M Case’ (Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co v Beiersdorf (Australia) Ltd [1980] HCA 9). [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., 126 F. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., 669 P.2d 744, 748 (N.M. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
., 712 F.3d 51 (1st Cir. 2013), and Harden Manufacturing Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
., Oct. 29, 1998) Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 6:45 am by Thomas Braun
In order to protect some industries, the House bill exempts any “iron mining extraction and processing facility” or “paper mill, wood products manufacturer, sawmill, or oriented strand board manufacturer” that would otherwise be subject to potential rate increases stemming from the standard. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 10:01 pm by News Desk
Brackett served as Senior Vice President and Chief Science and Regulatory Officer for the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA) and as Director of the U.S. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
Indeed the English Courts had for a long time expressed some discomfort with exercising jurisdiction over questions of infringement of foreign patents, for example, per Aldous J in Plastus Kreativ v Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. [1995] RPC 438 at 447:  “For myself I would not welcome the task of having to decide whether a person had infringed a foreign patent. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 2:34 am by Susan Perera
   These include 3M (previously Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company), AT&T (previously American Telephone and Telegraph Corporation), and BP (previously British Petroleum). [read post]