Search for: "Minor v. F. C. I"
Results 141 - 160
of 945
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
The third category consisted of a single document, an ICE memorandum titled “ICE Ability to Use 212(a)(3)(C) Foreign Policy Charge. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 10:38 am
., b/n/f Tricia Gracey Tominack v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:51 am
Following a line of cases I just don’t conceptually understand, the Court in Kryikoulis v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 5:54 am
William Shakespeare, Measure for Measure (c. 1604), Act II, scene i. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 3:05 pm
Carey, 172 F.3d 1268 (10th Cir. 1999); United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:28 am
In Carrasco v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:16 am
C. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 2:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
[I.] [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 10:51 am
5 years ago, in U.S. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 8:21 am
Rossiter, 583 F.3d 967, 970 (7th Cir. 2009). [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 2:07 pm
” Shapo v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm
Co., 827 F.2d 1291, 1293–95 (9th Cir. 1987) (state law "prohibiting the distribution of sexually explicit material to minors," which was seen as "embod[ying]" a "public policy" of "protecting minors from 'adult entertainment'"); Carlin Comnc'n, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:29 am
Wyeth, ___ F. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 7:18 pm
That means that even Class F–I felons have PRS, which in turn means that the sex offenders among those lower-level felons—including Class F indecent liberties offenders—get pulled into the 5-year rule in G.S. 15A-1368.2(c). [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:48 am
By the time we get to point 17 (subsection C and F), she expresses her frustration with the bullying she feels she is being subjected to: c. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 3:45 am
Thanks to a court decision earlier this month, in Alf Naman Real Estate Advisors, LLC v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:29 pm
Factors Set Forth in Family Court Act 413(1)(F) Should Be Considered Only Where Court Is Able to Calculate Basic Child Support Obligation Pursuant to Family Court Act 413(1)(C), Not Where Calculated Pursuant to Family Court Act 413[1][K] In Salvatore D. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
”) Brad Benbrook, Steve Duvernay and I are representing the Firearms Policy Coalition and some other plaintiffs in challenging the law. [read post]
