Search for: "Modification Review Board"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,321
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2017, 4:51 pm
Four researchers whose proposals were nixed during an earlier, closed-door reviewer session sought to reverse those decisions.Only two out of the four won over the board. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:04 am
" It is tough to determine what "assertions" the Board was referring to, since a review of the briefs shows that the appellants' arguments were directed more toward showing that the proposed modification would have rendered the prior art device unsatisfactory for its intended purpose. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:26 am
" It is tough to determine what "assertions" the Board was referring to, since a review of the briefs shows that the appellants' arguments were directed more toward showing that the proposed modification would have rendered the prior art device unsatisfactory for its intended purpose. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 4:55 pm
Moreover, this new, low-hurdle, threshold inquiry required by the Court to determine an agency’s ability to proceed under CEQA’s subsequent review rules – as opposed to treating a proposal as an original project subject to a de novo initial review under CEQA – is a predominantly factual one to be resolved by the agency itself, subject to substantial evidence review. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a forthcoming article for the University of Cincinnati Law Review, Stephen M. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:08 pm
Revenue Procedure 2015-27 contains modifications to Revenue Procedure 2013-12, 2013-4 I.R.B. 313. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 8:59 am
Although the Board decided that there was sufficient similarity to institute the IPR, it ultimately ruled that the modification of the 1991 compound to create lacosamide was beyond ordinary skill in the art. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 2:32 pm
We review the Board’s factual findings for substantial evidence and its legal conclusions de novo. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:00 am
The proposal submitted to Citigroup and Bank of America called for a review of, and a report on, legal compliance and internal controls relating to loan modifications, foreclosures and securitizations. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm
The video game industry’s self-regulatory group, Entertainment Software Ratings Board (ESRB), proposed modifications to its compliance obligations for children’s online privacy regulations. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 3:23 pm
The following discussion board post is by Sean Donahue of Donahue & Goldberg, LLP. [read post]
7 May 2009, 4:58 pm
OAR 137-055-3420 (Periodic Review): this change clarifies that a temporary modification does not affect the time period for a periodic review and adjustment of the order that is suspended. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 4:41 pm
To accompany the template, Liebert Cassidy Whitmore also drafted a guide that identifies specific obligations under the regulation so that schools may more easily identify existing district policies and practices that require modification. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 11:57 am
In 1994, when the property was owned and occupied by the former owner, Ainslie Corporation, the board granted a special permit and site plan review approving a proposed 3,750 square foot addition subject to thirty-four conditions. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 5:34 am
Should the 2014 Election Rule be retained with modifications? [read post]
21 May 2014, 7:23 am
Recently, the Benefits Review Board decided a case on Appeal of the Decision and Order Denying Benefits of Colleen A. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 7:25 pm
"As additional comments are received, further modifications will be considered. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 9:50 am
The Massachusetts Department of Industrial Accidents Reviewing Board recently issued a decision in the case of Gradziel v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 2:14 am
On June 10, 2008, the USPTO published new Rules of Practice Before the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in Ex Parte Appeals (73 Fed. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 10:00 pm
Hartung Since the creation of patent reviews at the Patent Office Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) by the America Invents Act of 2011, a very high percentage of reviewed patents have been declared invalid. [read post]
