Search for: "Modular Arts Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2023, 1:14 am by centerforartlaw
Art that is Sent to Modular Systems Beyond Earth Modular systems are systems composed of detachable self-contained units. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:00 am by Eric Schweibenz
By way of background, the Complainant in this investigation is Norgren Inc. [read post]
2 May 2007, 3:46 am
Teleflex Inc., providing its take on performing an obviousness analysis under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 9:36 am
The leading case construing section 2019.210 is Advanced Modular Sputtering, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 11:24 am
Angelin (2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 133 and Advanced Modular Sputtering, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 11:24 am
Angelin (2009) 172 Cal.App.4th 133 and Advanced Modular Sputtering, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 7:30 am
("Tessera") and the Respondents are Acer, Inc., Acer America Corporation, Elpida Memory, Inc., Elpida Memory (USA) Inc., Kingston Technology Corporation, Nanya Technology Corporation, Nanya Technology Corporation U.S.A., Powerchip Semiconductor Corporation, ProMOS Technologies, Inc., Ramaxel Technology, Ltd., Centon Electronics, Inc., SMART Modular Technologies, Inc., TwinMOS Technologies, Inc., and TwinMOS… [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 7:23 am by Stefanie Levine
In October, the PTO Board of Appeals ruled in a reexamination proceeding that claims 1-18 were invalid over the prior art. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 7:23 am by Stefanie Levine
In October, the PTO Board of Appeals ruled in a reexamination proceeding that claims 1-18 were invalid over the prior art. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:58 am
” In reaching this conclusion, the Court reviewed two recent California appellate decisions, Advanced Modular Sputtering, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:58 am
" In reaching this conclusion, the Court reviewed two recent California appellate decisions, Advanced Modular Sputtering, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
Fido's Fences, Inc (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC reverses TTAB’s Bose fraud ruling, eviscerates Medinol: In re Bose Corporation (TTABlog) (TTABlog) (Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IPKat) (Patently-O) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) 9th Circuit finds in favour of Paris Hilton in her suit against Hallmark Cards for violating her right of publicity and using her THAT’S HOT registered trademark without permission: Hilton v… [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am by Patent Arcade Staff
Cir. 1996): Alpex had a patent on a modular plug-in video game system which it accused Nintendo of infringing, but the court found no infringement. [read post]