Search for: "Montana Water Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 488
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2014, 1:24 pm
Supreme Court which appointed a special master who oversaw the proceedings and made recommendations to the Court. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 10:51 am
He founded the law school’s Environment and Natural Resources program and served as a special master for the United States Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:22 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0131, 2010 MT 111, NORTHERN CHEYENNE TRIBE, a federally recognized Indian tribe, TONGUE RIVER WATER USERS’ ASSOCIATION, and NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL, INC., Plaintiff-Intervenor and Appellants, v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 1:16 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0521, 2010 MT 127N, IN RE THE PARENTING OF D.N.S., a Minor, ASHLEY N. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:28 am
It looks like we might have more grist for the mill, because today, the Court agreed to review the Montana Supreme Court's ruling in PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 9:10 am
As specifically recognized by the district court in Montana v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 12:04 pm
The court in Montana v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:31 pm
The 13 states covered under the Court’s injunction are: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wyoming. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 8:44 am
Both husband and wife are lawyers: she practiced in Montana'a water court; he was in private... [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:25 pm
MARCIA COYLE: They did, because the court has to determine whether the rivers were navigable at the time that Montana entered the Union, which was 1889. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:06 pm
Just in time for today's (my one and only) class dealing with water law . . . the U.S. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 7:49 pm
In the case, the Montana Supreme Court held that the state of Montana owns and may charge for use of riverbeds where privately owned hydro-electric dams were located. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 7:09 am
Landowners in the other 13 states—which include North Dakota, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, South Dakota, and Wyoming—are still subject to the old definition of jurisdictional waters. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 10:26 am
The US Supreme Court stayed the Montana District Court’s vacatur and injunction of pipeline permits on Monday, except as applied to the Keystone XL pipeline. [read post]
2 May 2011, 10:52 am
When the Supreme Court interprets water law, it is fundamentally interpreting state law — as it did on Monday, looking closely at what Montana and Wyoming courts have said about appropriation rights.) [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 9:03 pm
For example, in Montana v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 11:00 am
The companies had previously appealed this order in federal court, which referred the case to a mediation process. [read post]
11 May 2020, 6:00 am
The effect of the court’s prior ruling vacated NWP 12 in its entirety and enjoined its use to authorize impacts to waters of the United States under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 12:39 pm
Army Corps of Engineers’ (Corps) have finalized their much-discussed joint “waters of the United States” definition and rule. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 3:16 pm
Hicks, or whether this Court acquiesces in the Ninth Circuit’s contrary decision in Water Wheel Camp Recreation Area v. [read post]
