Search for: "Motion Industries Inc" Results 61 - 80 of 4,343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2012, 2:34 pm by Eric Schweibenz
In the Order, ALJ Gildea granted-in-part nonparty Round Rock Research, LLC’s (“RRR”) motion to quash or limit a subpoena served on it by Respondents Hynix Semiconductor America, Inc., Hynix Semiconductor Inc., Elpida Memory, Inc., and Elpida Memory (USA) Inc. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 1:43 pm by Alex Gasser
  In the Order, ALJ Rogers denied Respondent Wetherill Associates, Inc. d/b/a WAI Global’s (“WAI”) motion to compel complainants Remy International, Inc. and Remy Technologies, L.L.C., (collectively “Remy”) to either amend their complaint to name BBB Industries, LLC (“BBB”) as a respondent or withdraw their request for a general exclusion order. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 9:55 am by Eric Schweibenz
Respondents Barnes & Noble, Inc. and barnesandnoble.com LLC (collectively, “Barnes & Noble”) opposed the motion, arguing that (1) subsections (A) and (B) of § 1337(a)(3) are limited to manufacturing activities and neither Microsoft, HTC (maker of Microsoft’s Windows Phone 7 domestic product, the HTC Surround) nor Amazon.com make the domestic industry products in the U.S.; (2) Microsoft failed to show that Amazon.com’s investments are… [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 3:21 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Luckern’s November 4, 2009 Initial Determination (Order No. 27) (“ID”) granting Complainant Humanscale Corporation’s (“Humanscale”) motion for summary determination on the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement in Certain Adjustable Keyboard Support Systems and Components Thereof (Inv. [read post]
21 May 2012, 11:48 am by Eric Schweibenz
Shaw issued the public version of Order No. 21 (dated April 13, 2012) denying Complainant OSRAM AG’s (“OSRAM”) motion for summary determination that it satisfied the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement in Certain Light-Emitting Diodes and Products Containing the Same (Inv. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 4:15 am
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., Defendant - and - United States Of America, Intervenor Defendants (Opinion, United States District Court for the District of Columbia, 23-CV-1506) DOJ RELEASES SEC RELEASES CFTC RELEASES FINRA RELEASES  SEC Sends F... [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 8:08 am by Zachary C. Jackson
Thomas Brown, OEM ProStaffing, Inc., OEM of CT, Inc., and David Fernandez (Case No. 3:13cv216). [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 9:32 am
Friedland filed the contribution action pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) § 113(f), against defendants appellees, The Industrial Company (TIC) and GeoSyntec Consultants Inc. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:24 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Pender issued the public version of Order No. 34 (dated June 20, 2012) granting-in-part motions by respondents LG Electronics, Inc., LG Innotek Co., Ltd., LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., and LG Innotek U.S.A., Inc. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 3:22 pm by Eric Schweibenz
James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 24 (dated February 14, 2012) denying Respondents Elpida Memory, Inc. and Elpida Memory (USA) Inc’s (collectively, “Elpida”) motion to compel production of documents in Certain Dynamic Random Access Memory and NAND Flash Memory Devices and Products Containing Same (Inv. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:56 pm by Eric Schweibenz
’s (collectively “Oki Data”) motions to preclude Complainants Ricoh Company, Ltd., Ricoh Americas Corporation, and Ricoh Electronics, Inc. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 2:31 am
A Financial Industry Regulatory Authority arbitration panel has ordered UBS Financial Services Inc. to pay investor Kajeet Inc. $80.8 million for failed auction-rate securities. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 11:34 am
Howard Industries, Inc., to consider a manufacturer's burden of proof to establish in a motion for summary judgment that its product was not flawed or defectively... [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 4:40 pm
Industrial Ventilation, Inc., currently planted in Washington State, Judge Lasnik recently denied Defendants' motion to transfer the case to Idaho, despite all the spuds being based there. [read post]