Search for: "Motorola Mobility Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 342
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2015, 3:26 pm by James Galvin
The following is a list of some of the UBS Reverse Convertible Notes offered: CUSIP Issuer Product Name 90261J426 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Starbucks Corp. 90261J434 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Intel Corp. 90261J459 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked to Apple, Inc. 90261J319 UBS Yield Optimization Notes with Contingent Protection linked linked to Occidental Petroleum Corp.… [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
The first edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence [Manual] was published in 1994, a year after the Supreme Court delivered its opinion in Daubert. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 7:15 am by Docket Navigator
Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc. et al, 3-12-cv-03587 (CAND April 8, 2015, Order) (Orrick, J.) [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/5FwuTQfV7i -> US states vow to fight Google after the FTC meekly rolls over http://t.co/05SSbWyR2F -> Bell ordered to change pricing for mobile TV app while it appeals CRTC ruling http://t.co/rPvs7SBl11 -> Guest editorial: Counterfeiting in the 21st century http://t.co/KA56vgF2Oh -> The hackers have gotten in. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 9:23 pm
(“Memorylink”) appeals from the decisions of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois (i) granting summary judgment in favor of Motorola Solutions, Inc. and Motorola Mobility, Inc. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 12:16 pm by RatnerPrestia
 For example in the recent Motorola Mobility decision, the PTAB, in denying a post-grant petition, stated it was “not persuaded [p]etitioner ha[d] shown that the claimed subject matter taken as a whole does not recite a technological feature that is novel and unobvious over the prior art. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 7:34 am by Gregory B. Williams
Motorola Mobility, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 11-798-LPS-SRF (D.Del., September 5, 2014), the Court granted the motion of defendants HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 8:51 pm
Gemalto sued HTC Corporation, HTC America, Inc., Exedea, Inc., Google, Inc., Motorola Mobility, LLC, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “defendants”) in the Eastern District of Texas, alleging infringement of various claims of the three patents. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 8:49 pm by Florian Mueller
Counsel for Motorola Mobility said that his client "might perhaps take a royalty-free license", which is hardly the basis on which Microsoft would settle the case.The official announcement of the Microsoft-Motorola deal referred only to Motorola Solutions, and did not mention Motorola Mobility (the mobile devices company that spun off of the original Motorola corporation and later sold to Google, with the other part… [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 6:26 pm
   Procedural HistoryMotorola Mobility LLC (“Motorola”) [argued before] the International Trade Commission[ that] Apple Inc. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 12:26 pm by Florian Mueller
IV is claiming in its dispute with Motorola Mobility (where a mistrial lately occurred in Delaware, but that's not the end of the story) that Android infringes some of its countless patents. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 5:52 pm
The Manufacturing Defendants [HTC, Motorola, and Samsung] manufacture mobile devices that allegedly employ Android and infringe [the '750 patent] sell more than 90 percent of [Android] mobile phones and 75 percent of [Android] tablets. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 8:12 pm by Florian Mueller
The Microsoft-Voxx agreement is the 26th Android-related royalty-bearing patent license agreement to have become known. 16 of those 21 Micosoft-Android deals (more than three-quarters) have occurred after the Google-Motorola Mobility merger agreement, a fact that proves no one in this industry believed Google was going to be able to secure a "free ride" for Android by cross-licensing Motorola Mobility's patents. [read post]