Search for: "Mountaineer Park, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 205
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
Around the world, environmental activists are advocating for giving legal personhood to mountains, rivers and forests. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 10:05 am by Arthur F. Coon
  When the encroachments and related parking problems were reported to its Public Works Department (DPW), the County began efforts to restore public parking on East Mountain Drive. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:58 pm by Richard West
Roadway was separated from its previous parent company, Roadway Services Inc. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 11:50 am by Arthur F. Coon
”  More specifically it would allow PS Resorts, a non-profit tourism organization, to place a 26-foot tall, 34,000-pound statue of Marilyn Monroe, known as “Forever Marilyn,” directly on the street for public view at a site adjacent to a downtown park “with a picturesque mountain backdrop and visibility from a major downtown thoroughfare. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:15 am by Allan Blutstein
This became known as the “impairment prong” of the National Parks test. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 4:03 am
  January 19, 2023 - 1 PM: In re SP Plus Corporation, Serial No. 87906630 [Refusal to register PARKING.COM for "Website providing information regarding parking availability" on the grounds of genericness, or alternatively, mere descriptiveness and lack of acquired distinctiveness]. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 6:24 am by Richard Hunt
The amphitheatre is set in the side of a mountain and it wasn’t easy to make seating accessible except along the edge of the plaza at the top and in the first row at the bottom. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
I've just finished up a rough draft of this article (6 years in the making), and I thought I'd serialize it here, minus most of the footnotes (which you can see in the full PDF). [read post]
In the first published opinion interpreting Senate Bill 35 (“SB 35”), a statutory process to streamline review of eligible residential and mixed-use development projects, the developer filed suit challenging the City of Berkeley’s decision to deny the developer’s request to apply the SB 35 process to a mixed-use infill development on an existing parking lot. [read post]
In the first published opinion interpreting Senate Bill 35 (“SB 35”), a statutory process to streamline review of eligible residential and mixed-use development projects, the developer filed suit challenging the City of Berkeley’s decision to deny the developer’s request to apply the SB 35 process to a mixed-use infill development on an existing parking lot. [read post]