Search for: "N A Mortgage Services Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2015, 6:46 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Foreclosure Opinions Body: AC35584 - American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:48 pm by Allison Tussey
The FTC established the MAP Rule, which later became Regulation N, to strengthen consumer protections by banning deceptive claims about mortgages. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 3:48 am
Conceding that the phrase GUARANTEED RATE is merely descriptive of its services, Applicant Guaranteed Rate, Inc. sought to register the phrase, and the word-plus-design mark shown below, for various mortgage lending services, under Section 2(f), claiming acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 8:52 am by Ronald Mann
  The borrower Freeman argues that the plain language of the statute applies whenever a fee is “give[n]” for services that are not provided, even if the originator retains the whole fee. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 3:51 am
The CAFC vacated the TTAB's decision affirming a Section 2(d) refusal of the mark GUILD MORTGAGE COMPANY & Design for "mortgage banking services, namely, origination, acquisition, servicing, securitization and brokerage of mortgage loans" [MORTGAGE COMPANY disclaimed] in view of the registered mark GUILD INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT for "Investment advisory services" [INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT disclaimed]. [read post]
Both consent orders assert violations of Regulation Z and the Mortgage Acts and Practices—Advertising Rule (the “MAP Rule” or Regulation N), and Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act (the Consumer Financial Protection Act) for Sovereign’s and Prime Choice’s advertising of VA mortgages to service members and veterans dating back to January 1, 2016. [read post]
As it did in the Sovereign and Prime Choice consent orders, the CFPB finds in the Go Direct consent order that Go Direct violated Regulation Z and the Mortgage Acts and Practices—Advertising Rule (the “MAP Rule” or Regulation N), and Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act (the Consumer Financial Protection Act) in its advertising of VA-guaranteed mortgages to service members and veterans. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:25 pm by Law Lady
KENNETH KUBLER, Defendant-Appellant. 11th Circuit.Consumer law -- Mortgage foreclosure -- Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act -- Loss mitigation -- Loan servicer had no duty to evaluate an application for loss mitigation options submitted by borrowers when, at time application was submitted, a foreclosure sale of borrowers' property was scheduled to occur in two days -- Under Regulation X, which implements RESPA, a loan servicer's duty to evaluate a… [read post]