Search for: "N-CORPE" Results 41 - 60 of 6,193
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2024, 4:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Corp. v McManus & Richter, _ AD3d _, 2024 NY Slip Op 00799, * 5 [1 st Dept 2024]). [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Supreme Court Rules Public Officials Can Sometimes Be Sued for Blocking Critics on Social Media Associated Press News – Mark Sherman | Published: 3/14/2024 A unanimous Supreme Court ruled public officials can sometimes be sued for blocking their critics on social media. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 4:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Mayor of City of New York v Brady, 115 NY 599, 617 [1889]; United States v Throckmorton, 98 US 61, 68 [1878]), or part of a “larger fraudulent scheme” (Newin Corp. v Hartford Acc. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm by admin
Supp. 2d 531, 543, 545 n.37 (S.D.N.Y.2004) (excluding opinions on intent and motive, as well as historical narrative gleaned form otherwise admissible documentary evidence); In re Baycol Prods. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:36 am by Guest Author
But the Court did not apply a deferential standard of review in all administrative interpretation cases, as Judge Friendly explained in Pittson Stevedoring Corp. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal The Quiet Way Democrats Hope to Expand Their Power at the State Level DNyuz – Nick Corasaniti (New York Times) | Published: 2/20/2024 Locked out of power on the U.S. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 12:47 pm by Alden Abbott
Back in February 2022, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) on “deceptive or unfair earnings claims. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am by Eugene Volokh
[The decision allows such pseudonymity when the defendant has already been found (by default judgment) to have committed the assault, but Judge Wilkinson's concurrence argues that, absent this unusual factor, one-sided pseudonymity should be frowned on.] [read post]