Search for: "NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY" Results 81 - 100 of 163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2010, 9:45 am by steven perkins
It is in this spirit that the United States today proudly lends its support to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Declaration). [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
Environmental Protection Agency, reportedly called the agreements “a PR stunt. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 2:47 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
L. 311 (2013).CPIA import restrictions prohibit designated archaeological and ethnological objects from entering the United States. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, December 23, 2009 Under Section 122(h)(1) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States Environmental Protection Agency has entered into a settlement for reimbursement of past response costs concerning the East 23rd Battery Site located in Tampa,  Hillsborough County, Florida for publication.… [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 4:17 pm by Scott Birkey and R. Clark Morrison
Other notable revisions to the concept of critical habitat include changes that address the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Weyerhaeuser Co. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am by Steven M. Taber
On July 9, 2010, Plaintiff United States of America (“United States”), on behalf of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) filed a complaint in this matter pursuant to CERCLA Section 107, 42 U.S.C. 9607, seeking recovery of environmental response costs incurred by EPA related to the release or threatened release or disposal of hazardous substances at or from the Site. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 4:53 pm
The EPA pointed them to National Fish and Wildlife Wetlands Inventory. [read post]
Fish and Wildlife Service from treating species listed as “threatened” under the federal ESA as “endangered,” and clarified when federal agencies are required to consult over the impact of federal actions on listed species and habitat. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 26, 2010 Rhode Island Airport Corporation and its demolition contractors, O.R. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 1:24 pm by WIMS
Petitioner Akiak Native Community and other petitioners and intervenors (collectively Petitioners or Akiak) seek review of the approval by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of the State of Alaska's application to assume responsibility for administration of portions of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), pursuant to section 402(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA). [read post]
(2) Does the Federal Power Act preempt state court challenges to an environmental impact report prepared under the California Environmental Quality Act in order to comply with the federal water quality certification under the federal Clean Water Act? [read post]