Search for: "NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURER'S INSURANCE GROUP"
Results 61 - 71
of 71
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
The other states (Arizona, New Jersey, Ohio, Oregon, North Dakota, and Utah) use fraud on the FDA as an exception to compliance-based bars on punitive damages. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
This could occur, the Appellate Division held, because the defendant was a New Jersey corporation and New Jersey's "strong interest in deterrence" of consumer fraud by New Jersey businesses outweighed all other states' interests. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 12:56 am
Lawyer Becomes First to Plead to New Jersey's Anti-Runners Law
New Jersey Law Journal
Eight years after New Jersey enacted a statute barring lawyers from using paid runners to drum up business, a personal injury lawyer has become the first to plead guilty to the charge. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Zimmer, Inc., 927 F.2d 124, 129 (2d Cir. 1991) (applying New York law); Phelps v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 7:00 am
Earlier this year, the Second Circuit addressed a physician's effort to use New York's consumer protection statute, General Business Law § 349, against a medical device maker in Vitolo v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 2:10 am
"
New Jersey Law Journal ®P.O. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
School of Law's Robert K. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 1:11 am
Ducks Major Punitive Damages in SUV Rollover Suit
New Jersey Law Journal
Ford Motor Co. may have been spared a monster punitive damages verdict in an SUV rollover case because its lawyer was allowed to tell jurors about the carmaker's dire financial straits and mass layoffs. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 12:58 am
That omission drew him a criminal conviction, followed by ethics charges, and the New Jersey Supreme Court's Disciplinary Review Board voted last week to reprimand him. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 7:50 am
Scott Garrett, a Republican from New Jersey, agreed. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:08 am
The judge found that the Respondents violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) by refusing to recognize and bargain with the Union, refusing to execute the memorandum of agreement, which is effective from June 1, 2004 to Dec. 31, 2007, refusing to give effect to and apply the terms of the memorandum of agreement, and transferring unit employees from the Northern New Jersey Teamsters Benefit Pan to the plan maintained by Park View Towers without offering to bargain with the Union and without… [read post]
