Search for: "NMSP"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2011, 5:41 am
These cases were investigated by the DEA, NMSP, APD and the USMS, and are being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Elaine Y. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 6:40 pm
Rees, and was investigated by the NMSP and HSI. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:40 am
Readers may recall that the NMSP program received lukewarm industry participation, which is apparently resulting in the new mandatory approach. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 1:23 pm
" My own view is that response to the NMSP has been lukewarm, at best. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 7:13 am
On January 12, 2009, US EPA published its first of two anticipated reports on the Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 10:11 am
A total of 22 organizations have participated in the NMSP to date, submitting information on more than 93 nanomaterials. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 8:40 pm
Head over to vote on how you think NMSP is doing so far. [read post]
21 Aug 2008, 1:57 pm
Since our news release, participation in the NMSP has bumped up a bit. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 2:51 pm
First, while the NMSP has been running for six months, the entirety of that time was spent on collection submissions from voluntary participants. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 2:50 pm
NMSP asked companies to report voluntarily to EPA existing data concerning nanoscale materials’ uses, hazards, exposure levels, and risk-management practices. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:40 pm
The first phase of EPA's voluntary Nanoscale Materials Stewardship Program (NMSP) closes on Monday. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 1:41 pm
Circle July 28, 2008 on your calendar, as that's when the window for voluntary reporting under the Basic Program closes.While the full NMSP is slated to run for 2 full years, data submissions under the Basic Program are to be in by July 28. [read post]
30 May 2008, 6:37 am
" The stalling in the submission, albeit it light before, is not a good sign going forward for the program.Additionally, and as we've previously discussed here, there is concern that the lackluster response associated with the VRS is a harbinger of what is to come under US EPA's NMSP. [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:41 am
EPA seeks participants for in-depth portion of NMSP - Washington, D.C. attorney Lynn L. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 11:48 am
SVTC begins by identifying several federal regulatory issues it believes need immediate attention: increased NNI funding for EHS research; collection of EHS data for all nanoscale materials; determining whether mass-based metrics are appropriate for nano-regulatory purposes; developing efficient instruments to detect and monitor nanoparticles; making sure manufacturers issue proper material safety data sheets; closing alleged nano-regulatory gaps in TSCA, RCRA, CWA, CAA, CERCLA, and EPCRA; closing… [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 9:14 am
Gulliford did an excellent job explaining both the structure and importance of EPA's NMSP. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 9:26 am
In that time, two companies, DuPont and Office 2PI have registered under the NMSP. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 2:52 pm
Indications are that if companies continue to join the NMSP then it will remain a voluntary program. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 11:45 am
I expect widespread participation in the NMSP because it will help us all better understand nanomaterials and implement a more effective oversight program. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 11:03 am
Rosenberg of The McCormack Firm in his Boston ERISA & Insurance Litigation Blog First NMSP submission - Ohio lawyer Michael E. [read post]
