Search for: "Nafta"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
NAFTA was mainly negotiated by the Bush administration. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
NAFTA was mainly negotiated by the Bush administration. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
There is nothing in NAFTA that permits one party to withdraw from NAFTA with respect to one but not the other NAFTA party. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 9:13 pm
. - Osgoode Hall Law) has posted Reforming the NAFTA Investment Regime. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 5:58 am
More on NAFTA Chapter 20, including a list of all complaints, here. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 6:00 am
Certain commentators are attributing these trends to the ambiguous NAFTA situation and the looming threat of trade wars. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 1:18 am
The revised NAFTA text includes new U.S. exceptions to the old NAFTA trucking obligations that allow the U.S. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 6:04 am
Absent an extension, NAFTA 2.0 would be terminated at the end of year 16. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 3:35 am
The mythical so-called NAFTA Superhighway is a critical step in the plot. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 9:56 am
* Committee for Justice: CFJ Urges NAFTA Negotiators to Protect Online Free Speech * Bennet Kelley: Academics Call on Trump to Address Digital Trade in New NAFTA * * * Partially related: Variety: NAFTA Renegotiation Triggers New ‘Safe Harbor’ Copyright Battle [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 9:56 am
* Committee for Justice: CFJ Urges NAFTA Negotiators to Protect Online Free Speech * Bennet Kelley: Academics Call on Trump to Address Digital Trade in New NAFTA * * * Partially related: Variety: NAFTA Renegotiation Triggers New ‘Safe Harbor’ Copyright Battle [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 8:30 am
Congratulations to Tequila Brooks and Lance Compa (emeritus, Cornell ILR) on the publication of the second edition of NAFTA and NAALC: Twenty-Five Years of North American Trade - Labour Linkage (Wolters Kluwer 2019)! [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 7:42 am
The U.S. wants to "eliminate" NAFTA Chapter 19; Canada and Mexico want to keep it. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 8:16 am
NAFTA lives but with significant changes. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 6:07 am
I haven't yet gotten to the substantive discussion of the NAFTA Chapter 19 panel finding that zeroing violates U.S. law, but in the meantime let me ask this question: Is there any chance this finding will lead to a constitutional challenge to NAFTA Chapter 19? [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 6:54 am
NAFTA marking issues are complicated. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 6:59 am
I also get that NAFTA as a whole is not particularly popular at the moment. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 5:07 am
More broadly, they seem to want to make NAFTA more like the TPP. [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 12:01 am
Defenders of NAFTA have two main responses. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 11:30 am
On Sunday, September 30, 2018, the U.S. and Canadian governments announced that they had reached agreement on a new trilateral trade agreement with Mexico, which will replace the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). [read post]
