Search for: "Narragansett Indian TribeĀ " Results 41 - 58 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2009, 3:20 pm
Department of the Interior could not place land in trust for the tribe because the Narragansetts were not under federal jurisdiction when the Indian Reorganization Act became law in 1934. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 12:42 pm
The Supreme Court here considers the Narragansett Tribe of Rhode Island's rights under the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 and the Rhode Island Indian Claims Settlement Act. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 7:16 am
The Court thus vetoed action by the Interior Department to provide a 31-acre parcel of land in Rhode Island to the Narragansett Indians. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 4:00 am
Kempthorne (07-526), on whether the Secretary of the Interior improperly took land into trust on behalf of the Narragansett Indian Tribe in Rhode Island. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 4:00 am
Kempthorne (07-526), on whether the Secretary of the Interior improperly took land into trust on behalf of the Narragansett Indian Tribe in Rhode Island. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 11:10 pm
Interior Secretary to approve the Narragansett Indian Tribe’s request to have a 31-acre parcel of land it owns in the town of Charlestown, R.I., placed in trust for the tribe. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 6:19 pm
  In this  case, the government took land from Rhode Island and gave it to the Narragansett tribe. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 8:04 pm
The contentious relationship between the State of Rhode Island and the Narragansett Indian Tribe dates back to at least 1880, when - after protracted resistance to Rhode Island's efforts to assimilate it - the Tribe surrendered its tribal authority and sold all but two acres of its lands to the State for five thousand dollars. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 8:04 pm
Journal contained an article that begins, "The fate of 31 acres in Charlestown owned by the Narragansett Indian tribe will be argued before the U.S. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 8:42 am by Robert N. Clinton
The case involves efforts by the State of Rhode Island to prevent additional lands from being taken in trust by the federal government for the Narragansett Tribe. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 7:04 am
  The Secretary in 1998 approved the Narragansett Indian Tribe’s application to have a 31-acre parcel of land owned by the tribe and located in Charlestown, R.I., to be taken into trust for the tribe. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 8:44 pm
Journal will contain an article that begins, "To many Narragansett Indians, the upcoming trial of seven tribe members accused of fighting with state police officers as they raided a tribal smoke shop is the continuation of centuries of mistreatment at the hands of Rhode Island leaders. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 9:18 am
"Court sides with Narragansetts in key ruling on land": The Providence Journal on Saturday contained an article that begins, "An appeals court ruled yesterday that the federal government could take 31 acres into trust for the Narragansett Indian Tribe in a case at the crux of a struggle between the state and the tribe over control of tribal lands. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
A federal appellate court ruled in favor of using the Boston Public Library steps for an inbound elevator that goes to the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA), despite neighborhood claims that this violated historical preservation statutes. [read post]
19 Sep 2005, 9:49 am
Supporters of the casino, proposed by the Narragansett Indian tribe [tribe website] and the Las Vegas-based Harrah's Entertainment, [read post]
15 Aug 2005, 10:39 am
[JURIST] Leading Monday's states brief, the Rhode Island Supreme Court [official website] heard oral arguments today on whether a casino proposed by the Narragansett Indian tribe [tribe website] and the Las Vegas-based Harrah's Entertainment would be a constitutional expansion of gambling. [read post]