Search for: "National Amusements Inc" Results 81 - 100 of 127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(IP Think Tank) New force in Europe – EPLAW Patent Blog (IP Think Tank) IP references left out of last-minute, weak global climate deal in Copenhagen (IP Watch) UN Climate Change Conference, Copenhagen – IP discussion (IPKat) (Spicy IP) (IP Watch) (IP Watch) (WIPO) Implementing the Development Agenda nationally: WIPO seminar (Jeremy de Beer) WIPO traditional knowledge meeting stalls, but begins to breach trust gap (IP Watch) Poverty in the developing world: Should TRIPs really… [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 6:29 am by Andrew Delaney
  The factual recital: on March 18, 2005, Borrower executed a promissory note to Option One Mortgage Corporation for $54,000, secured by a mortgage on the real property (the note and mortgage are now held by Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“Lender”)) pursuant to an endorsement in blank contained in an allonge to the note and an assignment of mortgage from American Home Mortgage Serving, Inc. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:38 am
Registration of the national trade mark POLDO would enable the applicant to take unfair advantage of Olive Oyl the reputation enjoyed by the opponent’s trade marks. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 7:21 am by admin
One example: condominium lender Corus Bank, a unit of Corus Bankshares Inc. that failed in 2009. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 3:18 am
The only reason Imus is off the air, and it’s not a censorship issue, or even relevant whether Imus is really a racist or just playing one for laughs that only he and his cohorts find amusing, is because of the marketplace.Had American Express Co., Sprint Nextel Corp., Staples Inc., Procter & Gamble Co., and General Motors Corp. not decided to pull advertising to distance their brands from the show, would MSNBC and CBS really have listened to and acted on the concerns of… [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 3:02 am
Readers can imagine the comedy scene of fluffy paws trying to operate a smartphone (of an un-named brand), and may amuse themselves perusing the results @EIP_Elements. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 4:26 pm
  Introduction On August 31, 2009, The Walt Disney Company (“Disney”) and Marvel Entertainment, Inc. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 12:08 am
ALM Privacy Policy / Contact Us © 2007 ALM Properties, Inc. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 1:00 am
(IP Dragon) Copycats in China: trains, planes and ... automobiles (IP Dragon)   Denmark Copenhagen Maritime and Commercial Court rules Innocent Pictures ApS’ use of ‘Tivoli’ and ‘Tivoli Night’ in context of pornographic broadcasts infringes trade mark rights of Danish amusement park TIVOLI A/S (Class 46) Court finds minimal confusion in MINIMAL case (International Law Office)   Europe ECJ: Promotional items do not qualify… [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 9:14 am by Dennis Crouch
Guest Post by Professor Amelia Smith Rinehart (University of Utah) Recently, the Federal Circuit held that the New York Times and others infringed patents claiming methods and systems for delivering content to smartphones.[1] In a related Patently-O essay, Professor Sam Ernst states that the Federal Circuit’s opinion in Helferich is “directly contrary to Supreme Court precedent and represents a fundamental misunderstanding of one of the core purposes of the exhaustion doctrine. [read post]