Search for: "National Fire Insurance of Hartford" Results 1 - 20 of 109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2018, 12:54 pm by Tim Springer
The company was originally founded in 1810 by local merchants as Hartford Fire Insurance Company and covered damages sustained in the fire which destroyed the New York Financial District in 1835, the Chicago Fire of 1871, and the 1906 San Francisco earthquake and fire. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 12:54 pm by Tim Springer
The company was originally founded in 1810 by local merchants as Hartford Fire Insurance Company and covered damages sustained in the fire which destroyed the New York Financial District in 1835, the Chicago Fire of 1871, and the 1906 San Francisco earthquake and fire. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 7:53 am
The case was, National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford, as Assignee of Kelvin Ray Gatlin v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 11:21 am by Michael S. Levine
In a June 1, 2016 decision, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in National Fire Insurance Co. of Hartford et al. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 2:20 pm by admin
  Robinson tendered its defense to its CGL insurer National Fire. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 3:30 am by Kenneth Kan
 Hartford Insurance Company.1 In Williams, the California Supreme Court reviewed the trial court's handling of jury instructions as to whether a total or only a partial loss resulted from a fire. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 7:36 am
  Certain subrogating insurance companies, including Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company (“HSB”), reimbursed APS for the loss and brought an action against MD&A for recoupment, which ultimately settled for $8.5 million.Other insurance companies, including plaintiff National Union Fire Ins. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:51 pm
Plaintiffs sought defense and indemnification coverage from National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford (NFICH) for an underlying personal injury action. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 11:01 am by admin
This is an archived article from 2007, yet we feel that it is more than relevant today due to insurance companies’ continued push to delay, deny, and defend when dealing with all types of insurance claims/policy holders. [read post]