Search for: "National Railroad Passenger Corp.,"
Results 1 - 20
of 69
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
National Railroad Passenger Corp is also known as Amtrak. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
Today, the Fifth Circuit will be hearing oral arguments in National Horsemen's Benevolent and Protective Association v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
A cab driver who is required to serve all passengers has no First Amendment right to refuse to take people who are visibly carrying Israeli merchandise. [read post]
3 May 2023, 6:00 am
Supreme Court addressed the continuing violation doctrine with respect to alleged acts unlawful discrimination in a workplace situation in National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 6:00 am
Supreme Court addressed the continuing violation doctrine with respect to alleged acts unlawful discrimination in a workplace situation in National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
., National Federation of Independent Businesses v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 7:01 am
The Supreme Court said that in National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
A hostile environment claim "involves repeated conduct," not "[d]iscrete acts such as termination, failure to promote, denial of transfer, or refusal to hire" (National Railroad Passenger Corporation v Morgan, 536 US 101, 114). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
A hostile environment claim "involves repeated conduct," not "[d]iscrete acts such as termination, failure to promote, denial of transfer, or refusal to hire" (National Railroad Passenger Corporation v Morgan, 536 US 101, 114). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
A hostile environment claim "involves repeated conduct," not "[d]iscrete acts such as termination, failure to promote, denial of transfer, or refusal to hire" (National Railroad Passenger Corporation v Morgan, 536 US 101, 114). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am
A hostile environment claim "involves repeated conduct," not "[d]iscrete acts such as termination, failure to promote, denial of transfer, or refusal to hire" (National Railroad Passenger Corporation v Morgan, 536 US 101, 114). [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 11:13 am
In November 2021, two rail worker unions filed separate suits against National Railroad Passenger Corp., which runs Amtrak, challenging the vaccine mandate. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am
With passenger service rudimentary into the 1930s, those subsidies were needed to keep commercial aviation aloft. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 3:45 pm
National Federation of the Blind; Hurley v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 5:52 am
Privately owned railroads are responsible for roughly 140,000 miles of track—including the vast majority of portions used by Amtrak for passenger traffic. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:08 pm
Subchapter III – Continued Assistance to Rail Workers; Expansion and Extension of Benefits For Railroad Workers The legislation reinstates the “federal bump” for unemployed railroad workers in the amount of $600 per registration period, beginning after December 26, 2020, until March 14, 2021. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 6:28 am
National Railroad Passenger Corp., a summary order issued on December 2. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
For another jurisdiction, if it should happen to lay hold of the actor, to treat him according to its own notions rather than those of the place where he did the acts, not only would be unjust, but would be an interference with the authority of another sovereign, contrary to the comity of nations, which the other state concerned justly might resent. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
For another jurisdiction, if it should happen to lay hold of the actor, to treat him according to its own notions rather than those of the place where he did the acts, not only would be unjust, but would be an interference with the authority of another sovereign, contrary to the comity of nations, which the other state concerned justly might resent. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 5:24 pm
For another jurisdiction, if it should happen to lay hold of the actor, to treat him according to its own notions rather than those of the place where he did the acts, not only would be unjust, but would be an interference with the authority of another sovereign, contrary to the comity of nations, which the other state concerned justly might resent. [read post]
