Search for: "National Union Fire Insurance Co. Pittsburgh, PA " Results 61 - 80 of 108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2012, 9:33 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
(collectively, the “policyholders”) sought coverage for the losses under a commercial crime policy issued by National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. [read post]
8 May 2013, 2:31 pm by ADeStefano
National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, PA., a declaratory judgment action, the Court of Appeals addressed four insurance coverage issues raised by repeated instances of sexual molestation of one child by a Queens priest from August 1996 to May 2002. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:00 am by Patrick Bracher (ZA)
[Towers Watson & Co v National Union Fire Insurance Co of Pittsburgh, Pa case no 1:20-cv-00810 in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia] https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/virginia/vaedce/1:2020cv00810/480216/234/ [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:40 pm by Cynthia Larose
The insurer, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, denied DSW’s claim for coverage under the Blanket Crime Policy. [read post]
8 May 2013, 2:31 pm by ADeStefano
National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, PA., a declaratory judgment action, the Court of Appeals addressed four insurance coverage issues raised by repeated instances of sexual molestation of one child by a Queens priest from August 1996 to May 2002. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 8:12 am
 The passengers filed suit against TLC’s excess insurer, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA (“National Union”). [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 8:49 am
Applying rules for construing contracts (see National Abatement Corp. v National Union Fire Ins. [read post]
9 May 2016, 5:42 am by ADeStefano
Co. of Pittsburgh, Pa., 21 NY3d at 154, quoting Consolidated Edison, 98 NY2d 208, 222 [2002]; see United States Fid. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 7:37 pm
Co. of Pittsburgh, PA, 92 AD3d 104 [1st Dept 2012]; see also City of New York v. [read post]