Search for: "Nelson Tebbe" Results 161 - 173 of 173
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2015, 5:48 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
Sawicki, Loyola University Chicago School of Law - Informed Consent and Disclosure of Providers’ Religious Convictions Moderator: Holly Fernandez Lynch, Executive Director, Petrie-Flom Center ​1:15 - 2:35pm: Panel 4, The Impact of Religious Objections on the Health and Health Care of Others Amy Sepinwall, University of Pennsylvania - Conscience and Complicity: Assessing Pleas for Religious Exemption inHobby Lobby's Wake Nelson Tebbe,… [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 8:26 am by Corey Brettschneider
(Among others, I worked with Joshua Matz, the publisher on this blog, as well as Micah Schwartzman and Nelson Tebbe.) [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 10:03 pm by Joey Fishkin
Micah Schwartzman, Richard Schragger, and Nelson Tebbe began an important conversation with their post on this blog about the contraceptive mandate and the Establishment Clause. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:41 am by Paul Horwitz
 I must thank them by name: Mark Tushnet, Anuj Desai, Joe Blocher, Rick Garnett and Nelson Tebbe (who together organized the conference), John Inazu, Randy Kozel, Fred Gedicks, and, although he couldn't make it at the last minute, Paul Schiff Berman. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 5:33 pm by Scott Bomboy
” Three law professors writing for the legal blog Just Security – Nelson Tebbe, Richard Schragger and Micah Schwartzman – make the opposite argument. [read post]
17 May 2016, 12:10 pm by Rick Garnett
To quote the symposium contribution of my friends and colleagues Nelson Tebbe, Micah Schwartzman, and Richard Schragger, it is a “demand of justice” that political authorities in diverse and sometimes disagreeing communities avoid, to the extent their obligations to promote and protect the common good allow it, burdening religious exercise or violating religious conscience. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 8:15 am by Guest Blogger
Micah Schwartzman, Richard Schragger, and Nelson TebbeWe have been arguing (here, here, and here) that a religious exemption to the contraception mandate would raise serious concerns under the Establishment Clause. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 5:01 am by Andrew Koppelman
Nelson Tebbe observes that this was different from earlier versions of MFN, because Kavanaugh "did not require the church to show that the exempted and regulated categories were comparable in order to shift the burden of justification to the government. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 6:09 am by Nelson Tebbe
Lawrence Sager & Nelson Tebbe This fall, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in Fulton v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm by Marty Lederman
In earlier posts, such as this one, I noted that in the context of commercial activities, the Supreme Court—and virtually every other court, for that matter—has consistently construed the Free Exercise Clause and religious accommodation statutes not to require religious exemptions from generally applicable regulations, from at least 1944 until this week. [read post]