Search for: "Nerds in Court"
Results 61 - 80
of 879
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2022, 4:15 am
The complaint that they filed in court belied their claims. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 12:30 pm
Remanded to state court. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 4:22 pm
Copyright nerds may be interested in the factum, which proved to be very influential, that Prof. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 9:57 am
Most the attention has focused on the reversal of part of the lower court's ruling in the Mar-a-Lago search case and on the civil claim filed in New York. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:56 pm
He will be missed on the court. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 11:22 am
" Great stuff for a WWII history nerd. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
However, since the plaintiff failed to raise this argument, she forfeited it — womp-womp — and the court did not have to consider it. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 4:57 am
After analyzing whether it had jurisdiction to review the claims (Appellate nerds: If jurisdiction is your thing, read the opinion), the court reviewed the ruling for an abuse of discretion and affirmed the trial court’s order. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 11:43 am
” Old-school CFAA nerds might recall that this fact pattern largely harks back to the criminal prosecution of United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 10:22 am
Lots of meaty law school exam/ethics nerd conference fodder here. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
Originally posted on July 19, 2019, the 50 year anniversary of what may be the high water mark of humanity and all we can accomplish, there is value in remembering how great we can be:The fascinating part of the historic Apollo 11 landing on the moon (50 years ago today) is the handling of the 1202 and 1201 alarms during the decent of the Eagle to the lunar surface.P63: Some Apollo-nerd stuff that you only get here: The Eagle's computer had three programs… [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 1:00 am
If you were to do a quick Google search on what the key skills for a paralegal are, what do you think you would find? [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 4:40 am
The court then completed what it deemed the “simple” task of applying the participation clause to this case. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 5:30 am
So the court picked a law professor. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 5:36 pm
On July 2nd, the trial court granted M.O. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:02 am
As I mentioned above, BriefCatch says that several Supreme Court justices use its product. [read post]
26 May 2022, 10:49 am
Indeed, Amar has harsh words for contrary arguments (some not repeatable on a family-friendly law-nerd blog). [read post]
11 May 2022, 5:01 am
A careful reader or Court nerd will observe that there is a clear disconnect between these two points: statutory certiorari is different from common law certiorari. [read post]
10 May 2022, 6:49 am
I wonder… I wonder… I wonder… Finally, we have a promise of a private sector ombudsman to try and resolve cases without court involvement. [read post]
8 May 2022, 9:45 pm
Retrospective leaks are primarily of interest to Supreme Court nerds like you and me. [read post]
