Search for: "New Cingular Wireless Services Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2020, 7:13 am
” * New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 6:13 am
Cingular Wireless LLC, 223 Ill.3d 1, 14 (Ill. 2006) (emphasis added). [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 11:10 am
This showed that New Cingular conducts significant business in wireless communications using the trade name “New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC” and, therefore, that New Cingular uses CINGULAR as part of its trade name, and that the trade name is known to the relevant public. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 6:06 am
Cingular Wireless LLC, 627 F.Supp.2d 1170, 1178 (E.D.Cal. 2008) (same; mention of plaintiff in press release); Films of Distinction, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
AT&T, Plaintiffs are current and former customers of defendants, New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc., and AT&T Mobility, LLC (“AT&T”). [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
March 16, 2012), Plaintiffs are current and former customers of defendants, New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc., and AT&T Mobility, LLC (“AT&T”). [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:21 am
Cingular Wireless,. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 12:20 am
Though the shares were allotted to AT&T Mauritius, all rights of voting, management, right to sell etc were vested in AT&T USA (subsequently known as “New Cingular Wireless Services Inc, USA” (“NCWS”). [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am
New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc., 498 F. 3d 976, 990 (CA9 2007)). [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
New Cingular Wireless Services, 606 F.3d 658 (9th Cir. 2010), issued in May and amended in September, in which the Ninth Circuit addressed the UCL's "unlawful" prong: In his complaint, Shroyer alleged that New Cingular violated the common law of unfair competition and breached his contract. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:55 pm
New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc., 498 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. 2007) (Shroyer), which invalidated an arbitration clause within Cingular’s service contracts pursuant to California law, also finding a class action waiver in those contracts to be unconscionable. [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:05 pm
New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc. (9th Cir. 2007) 498 F.3d 976, 983; In re Apple & AT & TM Antitrust Litigation (N.D.Cal. 2008) 596 F.Supp.2d 1288, 1298; Stiener v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 11:09 am
New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc. [read post]
14 May 2010, 8:54 am
New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc. (9th Cir. 2007) 498 F.3d 976, 983; In re Apple & AT & TM Antitrust Litigation (N.D.Cal. 2008) 596 F.Supp.2d 1288, 1298; Stiener v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 1:51 pm
United States Chief Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James, as if predicting the very contents of my April 21, 2010 Daily Journal article, ordered Defendants AT & T Mobility LLC, New Cingular Wireless PCS LCC, and New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc. to produce the contact information for thousands of customers that had complained after incurring international roaming charges without first issuing a privacy notice. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 12:26 pm
New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc., 498 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. 2007) and affirmed a District Court decision that a class arbitration waiver was unconscionable and unenforceable in a class action ? [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 4:11 am
New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc., 498 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. 2007). [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 8:11 pm
New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc., 498 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. 2007). [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 11:46 am
New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc., 498 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 5:08 am
New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc., 523 F.3d 719 (7th Cir. 2008), clarified Cole, and make it clear that no “value” requirement is imposed by the FCRA. [read post]
