Search for: "New Sensations, Inc. v. Does 1 -83" Results 1 - 20 of 36
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Amy Salyzyn
” (Noushin v Adesa Auctions Canada Corporation, 2015 ABQB 411) “To borrow from the satire of Monty Python, it is a non-entity and denial does not change that fact. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 7:58 am by Eugene Volokh
Lawson, Justice Thomas repeated his past criticisms of New York Times v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 2:45 am by Marc Whipple
It is an old principle, recently re-affirmed in TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 9:09 am by Rachel Sandler
§102(a)(1) does not cover non-public uses or non-public sales,” and “otherwise available to the public” is an added “modifier . . . restrict[ing] the meaning of the preceding clause. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 3:45 am by Marc Whipple
It is an old principle, recently re-affirmed in TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
Regrettably, I lack the time to tell you about the last remaining new relist, an important preemption case captioned Coventry Health Care of Missouri, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Guy in California now has $1 million in funding to make a Star Trek movie w/no permission from Paramount. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 9:04 pm by Marcos Beaton
State, 714 So.2d 479, 481 n.1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
Akamai Technologies, Inc., 12-786, and its conditional cross-petition, Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]