Search for: "Nicholas O'Donnell"
Results 21 - 40
of 54
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2015, 7:58 am
One thing you see in the Detroit News article yesterday, and even more so in Graham Beal's response to Nicholas O'Donnell here, is the usual bait-and-switch from the museums.On the one hand, if a museum goes to sell something to, for example, avoid going out of business, we hear: OH MY GOD THIS IS THE WORST THING EVER THAT WORK IS HELD IN TRUST FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS WE WILL NEVER GET OVER ITS LOSS NO ONE WILL EVER DONATE WORK TO A MUSEUM… [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 1:33 pm
Nicholas O'Donnell has his usual valuable commentary here. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 7:29 pm
Good summary from Nicholas O'Donnell here. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 12:19 pm
The usual excellent analysis from Nicholas O'Donnell here. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 12:50 pm
Nicholas O'Donnell takes a look. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:53 pm
From Nicholas O'Donnell. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:54 am
" Nicholas O'Donnell has some thoughts here. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 4:31 am
" Nicholas O'Donnell agrees: "We may indeed look back on this as pulling a rabbit out of a hat, when all is said and done. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 6:40 pm
Nicholas O'Donnell is with me on the pressing issue of monkeys and copyright. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 1:58 pm
Nicholas O'Donnell says "it is hard to see yet how long a shadow this case will case relative to Prince. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 3:02 pm
Nicholas O'Donnell tweets: "Huge. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 7:11 pm
Nicholas O'Donnell has all the details. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 9:25 am
" Nicholas O'Donnell on the Corcoran decision. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 9:56 am
Nicholas O'Donnell has his usual helpful commentary here. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:32 am
[emphasis removed].But this perspective is not universally shared: Nicholas O’Donnell, discussing a pending lawsuit on behalf of Los Angeles artist Victor Henderson comments:“The effective date of VARA is June 1, 1991. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 8:22 am
Nicholas O'Donnell comments here. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 1:19 pm
I wasn't as impressed with them as Nicholas O'Donnell was (though I thank him for the kind words about me). [read post]
22 May 2014, 6:31 pm
But Nicholas O'Donnell says "read carefully, ... the story is nothing new at all, just a retelling of last year's ';news' released around the anniversary of the theft and a raft of conjecture. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 7:23 am
The New York City Bar Association Art Law Committee has some good background here, and Nicholas O'Donnell has an excellent summary here. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 6:47 pm
The Velvet Underground wasn't claiming any copyright on the image, nor did the court rule that the Foundation "does not own rights" to the image.UPDATE: More from Nicholas O'Donnell: "Reporting of the decision has been spotty at best, however, ranging from declaring a ';win' for the Velvet Underground, to suggestions that the copyright question was decided. [read post]
