Search for: "Nicholson v. Nicholson"
Results 81 - 100
of 361
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2018, 7:19 am
Last week the Texas Supreme Court agreed to hear Texas Outfitters Limited v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:19 am
Last week the Texas Supreme Court agreed to hear Texas Outfitters Limited v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm
Events The State of Tobacco Control in Ireland with a focus on Trademarks, 2:00pm to 4:00pm on Tuesday 12 June 2018 in the Neill Lecture Theatre in the Trinity Long Room Hub Arts & Humanities Research Institute, Trinity College Dublin Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Eustice v Channel Seven [2008] SASC 73 Nicholson J dismissed an application for further particulars of a justification defence. [read post]
2 May 2018, 4:12 pm
Nicholson, 21 Vet. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:12 pm
Nicholson, 21 Vet.App. 360 (2007). [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 5:47 am
There could be no action under the Equalities Act 2010 since, although ‘belief’ is a protected characteristic, discrimination against an objectionable political belief does not count (see Grainger Plc v Nicholson [2010] ICR 360, [28]). [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 9:20 am
Nicholson, 20 Vet. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 11:23 am
Wheeler, 254 U.S. 281, 293 (1920); Saenz v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:35 am
Pim v. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 12:45 pm
These concepts were discussed by the Texas Supreme Court in Lesley v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 6:18 pm
The petition of the day is: Nicholson v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 6:25 am
Probably a disappointing and shocking one for Marie Schrader to hear (this one for Breaking Bad fans, see here), Norway: PURPLE HAZE; Norwegian courts rule that purple is not perceived as a trade mark for inhalers, reported by Thomas Hvammen Nicholson of the Kluwer Trademark Blog. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 11:35 pm
Contents include: Eirik Bjorge & Cameron Miles, Introduction William S Dodge, The Charming Betsy and The Paquete Habana (1804 and 1900) Michael Waibel, Mavrommatis Palestine Concessions (Greece v Great Britain) (1924–27) Chester Brown, Factory at Chorzów (Germany v Poland) (1927–28) Douglas Guilfoyle, SS Lotus (France v Turkey) (1927) Eirik Bjorge, Island of Palmas (Netherlands v United States of America) (1928) Rolf Einar Fife,… [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 2:04 am
In concluding that Kogan had not sufficiently contributed to the screenplay [para 85], even by adding to the first three drafts, Hacon J considered the following points and authorities: Adding elements not themselves covered by copyright, such as scenic effects, is not a sufficient contribution (as per Tate v Thomas [1921] 1 Ch 503)Providing helpful criticism and expert feedback on the work is not a sufficient contribution (as per Wiseman v George Weidenfeld &… [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 12:26 am
€$€The Authors' Take:-- Disparaging or offensive trademark registrations in the United States Are there any limits after the US Supreme Court's decision in Matal v Tam? [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:39 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:00 am
Nicholson v. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:21 pm
V. [read post]
