Search for: "Nixon v. Fine"
Results 21 - 40
of 145
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2021, 2:14 pm
And Clinton v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
For several weeks now, a constitutional conflict has been simmering on Capitol Hill. [read post]
19 May 2021, 8:47 am
With respect to the first, as I explain in my paper, “Congress, faced with a defiant executive branch, likely does not have any mechanism by which to enforce inherent contempt—whether fine or arrest—even if it had the desire to do so. [read post]
9 May 2021, 9:08 pm
Supreme Court’s 2000 decision in FDA v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am
Frank Bowman recently published an essay in Lawfare that criticized arguments I made in an essay on the site. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 12:31 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia, Hoffa v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:27 am
Nixon won both Florida and Ohio in 1960 but lost the election.] [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 7:37 am
Nixon). [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 4:39 pm
Citizen, 749 F.3d at 271 (quoting Nixon v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 5:40 am
Based on the foregoing, Lindenwood’s factual allegations fail to support the element of proximate cause (see Levine v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, 256 AD2d at 149-150; Gersh v Nixon Peabody LLP, 2017 NY Slip Op 30363[U], 2017 NY Misc LEXIS 682, * 18-19 [Sup Ct, NY County 2017]; Caso v Sklarin, 2016 NY Misc LEXIS 6863, * 12-13 [Sup Ct, NY County May 26, 2016, No. 159192/2015]). [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
” This chapter discusses the attacks on the rule of law by the President and some in his orbit, including: (i) the rule of law; (ii) criticisms of laws by the President; (iii) The Hatch Act; (iv) other examples of violations; (v) military law; and (vi) pardons. 12.2 Rule of Law The President of the United States takes an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 10:52 am
Circuit in Bluman v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 11:42 pm
Critically, Justice Harry Blackmun–a recent Nixon appointee–joined Justice Rehnquist's majority opinion. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Pueblo v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:49 am
District Court for the District of Columbia, Hoffa v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
What happens when the President simply thinks that he is not merely above the law but that, in Richard Nixon’s infamous words, “when the President does it, that means it is not illegal” at all? [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 6:56 am
(In the two years since Trump v. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 4:45 am
Humphrey, to switch to Nixon if that were necessary to deprive [George] Wallace of a majority. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
Swayne similarly was accused of imprisoning and fining lawyers without proper authority, as well as spending the majority of the year outside of his district. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
Return on investment arguments may eventually be fine-grained and precise enough to justify spending government money on civil justice INSTEAD of spending it on something else. [read post]
