Search for: "No Respondents Named"
Results 41 - 60
of 30,461
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2011, 1:00 am
Terry Hart responded to criticisms of such seizures, quite persuasively I thought, in a [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:52 am
This is why common words used as domain names for their everyday meaning without proof that the respondent had the complainant’s trademark in mind resist monopolization. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 2:24 am
The fields which need to be completed include: Names of petitioner and respondent Contact details and description of the respondent (a photograph should be included if available) Details of any vehicle owned by the respondent Various information about any potential danger posed by the respondent (eg if they hold a firearms licence and if they have any dangerous animals at their property etc) The court bailiff will use the above information to locate the… [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 9:34 pm
In an interesting twist, Respondent candidly admitted that she selected the name, Hairy Winston, as the name of her business with Complainants' famous trademark very much in mind. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
Summary of an Illinois Hearing Board report and recommendation in a matter involving an attorney named Cahnman The Respondent was charged in a three-count Complaint with having a conflict of interest and engaging in dishonesty. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 6:58 am
The Respondent was well aware of the Complainant and the Complainant's mark, and the Respondent clearly had notice that the Policy was applicable to domain name registrations in the dotMobi registry. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 10:01 pm
The respondent acquired the disputed domain name in 2008 and never established an active website there. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 7:45 pm
"Porn mogul Larry Flynt sues nephews over use of family name; Flynt says his good name in adult entertainment is being cheapened by his relatives' porn movies; They respond that Flynt is their name too": This article will appear Wednesday in The Los Angeles Times. [read post]
13 May 2010, 2:28 am
In Skyhook Wireless “the Respondent did not approach the Complainant to sell the disputed Domain Name, and the fact that the Respondent later considered the Complainant’s request to purchase the disputed Domain Name does not establish that this was the Respondent’s motivation for acquiring the disputed Domain Name in 2006. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:52 pm
“Responding to the mortgage crisis: Three Cleveland examples. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 2:21 am
Respondents registering common words that spell the name of a business or charitable entity state a good defense only if they use the domain names in the generic sense of the words and are not competitors. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:19 pm
The Complainant, WD-40 Company, owns valid US trademarks in WD-40 and seeks immediate transfer from the Respondent, Texas International Property Associates, of the disputed domain name www.wd-40company.com. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 9:19 pm
The Complainant, WD-40 Company, owns valid US trademarks in WD-40 and seeks immediate transfer from the Respondent, Texas International Property Associates, of the disputed domain name www.wd-40company.com. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 2:41 pm
Here is an update to my previous post about the legal battle between the two big names in invisible braces: ClearCorrect, LLC. responded to the allegations made against the company by rival company Align Technology, Inc., the creators of the Invisalign product. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 2:32 am
Panels have refused to find bad faith registration where the respondent registered the domain name on consent or at the request of the trademark owner and it was understood that the domain name belonged to the respondent and not the complainant. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:01 pm
., RipOff Report), cyber-libel via social media, domain name high-jacking, meta tag high-jacking and defamatory email campaigns. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 6:56 am
In addition, the evidence showing that Respondent used the domain name to host a "link farm", i.e. a list of sponsored links, was sufficient to determine that Respondent did not have any right or legitimate interest in the domain and had registered and used it in bad faith. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 2:18 am
” Since the Respondent’s redirected website is commercial the registration and use of the domain name are in bad faith. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
As Petitioner failed to name and serve these individuals, the Commissioner dismissed Petitioner’s appeal.The Commissioner also noted that that Petitioner had named the superintendent in the petition. [read post]
8 May 2013, 12:30 pm
Daniel Sokol Suhui Li and Avi Dor (both GW) ask How Do Hospitals Respond to Market Entry? [read post]
