Search for: "No Respondents Named"
Results 101 - 120
of 30,467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2011, 2:42 am
Andrew Kris, registered the disputed domain name because it is comprised of the first letter of his first (given) and his last name, and that the Second Respondent has used the disputed domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods and services, namely business process outsourcing and shared services, before notice of the dispute, which, according to the evidence provided by the Respondents, must have been clear to the Complainant… [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 4:17 am
If the respondent’s name is different from the domain name then it cannot have been commonly known by it; if it is the same, the respondent is either genuine or deceiving. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 2:24 am
” The significance of this is that the Complainant cannot demonstrate conclusively that the Respondent had its trademark in mind in registering the domain name. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 8:29 am
What Happens When Someone Names You in a Subrogation Claim? [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:36 am
” The Respondent lacked rights or legitimate interests, but retains the disputed domain name. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:00 am
The Browns filed a complaint with WIPO but the respondent from Italy did not respond despite multiple attempts to communicate by the Cleveland Browns and the WIPO. ? [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 5:39 am
The names of those injured in the crash have not been released by officers. [read post]
25 May 2010, 2:17 am
Silence with knowledge that a respondent has incorporated a trademark in its domain name can support legitimacy if the respondent has brought itself within the safe harbor of paragraph 4(c)(i) of the Policy. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 2:31 am
The Respondent in Paragon Mico is holding the domain name inactive, thus it “cannot presently be said that it is using the disputed domain name to attract visitors for commercial gain. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 1:19 pm
Typos, misspelling, wrong names and inconsistent dates in law school problem questions – they are usually a source of huge embarrassment for law teachers. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 7:00 am
The cash cow's name is Karma: A confusing press release is doing little to allay fears, Sen. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 8:36 am
To support his contentions, Respondent submitted 10 statements by his co-workers attesting to the nickname and printouts from Internet websites showing Respondent's use of the name "FENDIMAN" on the Internet. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:05 am
According to WIPO’s ruling, the Respondent was a German citizen who registered over 70,000 domain names. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 2:40 pm
" Ultimately, the Panel also found that the Respondent had no legitimate interest with respect to the disputed domain name and the disputed domain name was both registered and being used in bad faith and ordered the disputed domain name be transferred to the Complainant. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 2:47 am
The Respondent appeared, but provided little information about his historical use of the domain name. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
”Judge Zorgniotti denied the employee’s request explaining that “Requests for redaction are generally denied where, as here, respondent placed private health matters in issue by way of a defense and the request was made after respondent placed medical documents in the record and testified about them at a hearing. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 3:58 am
FIRST THINGS FIRST — DO NOT RESPOND. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 2:49 am
Israel Joffe, D2010-0860 (WIPO July 1, 2010) noted in connection with that case that the Respondent’s request for time “appears to be yet another attempt by a respondent to keep its domain names a bit longer, for whatever reason. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:04 pm
However, the statute does not specify procedures for responding to an in rem complaint. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:45 am
Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name. [read post]
