Search for: "Noble v. Allness et al" Results 41 - 60 of 81
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
Noble Maillard, Kevin and Rose Cuison Villazor, eds. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 9:33 am
 * You Say Tomaydo, I say Tomahhdo: Recipe Book Not Original, says US Court of AppealsJani covers the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit's decision in Tomaydo-Tomahhdo LLC v George Vozray et al, Case No. 15-3179, which dealt with the restaurant Tomaydo-Tomahhdo, and a subsequent cookbook bearing the restaurant's eccentric name. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:00 am by Ed Driscoll
The 2009 Canadian production brilliantly mixes documentary footage shot in Paris after the war, with actors recreating Wilson, Clemenceau, Lloyd George, Keynes, et al. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am by Don Cruse
WHITTINGTON, ET AL., No. 10-0316 Opinion of the Court Concurring and Dissenting This is a potentially major takings case about when government can take property for private (rather than public) benefit. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 3:37 pm by tjsllibrary
Gender, Sexualities and Law Jackie Jones et al. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
As Justice Souter wrote for a unanimous Supreme Court in Campbell v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 12:25 am by David Kopel
She writes that: The amicus brief by Kopel et al. paints a picture of widespread gun carrying incongruous with this well-established history. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 10:50 am by Ben
 The case is TLA Corporation, et al. vs. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
” Furthermore, VC Noble found that the plaintiffs’ other claims relating to price, process and disclosure (including the disclosure of projections and additional detail regarding the financial advisors’ financial analyses)  were not colorable and denied the plaintiffs’ motion for expedited proceedings in all other respects. [read post]