Search for: "Nominees of major political parties"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2012, 3:13 am
Our constitutional democracy rests on the principle of majority rule, and the majority rules through their elected representatives in Congress and the Executive Branch. [read post]
31 May 2009, 4:11 pm
If a nominee were shown to have repeatedly berated attorneys in the past or to show consistent close-mindedness in entertaining the arguments of the parties, then I think it would be perfectly appropriate to examine a nominee’s judicial temperament. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 12:17 pm
In all of these cases but the last one, the president's party had a majority in the Senate. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 5:35 am
That much politics is in the Constitution.But here's the tricky part. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 1:37 pm
While it’s tempting to blame obstructionist politics, it’s ultimately the majority party, and notably the Chair, who decide when to act. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 7:48 am
Cir. 8/15/2003) he dissented from the majority position that there was no subject matter jurisdiction and instead would have reached the same result as the majority by dismissing because the matter was not raised by the parties' briefs. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 10:11 am
(And I respectfully decline to disclose any of my personal political views!) [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 10:11 am
(And I respectfully decline to disclose any of my personal political views!) [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 1:01 am
Harding, would be the party’s nominee for president. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 2:08 pm
For obvious reasons, they may be disinclined to contribute money to candidates from either major party. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Suppose that Trump is again the GOP nominee or, if not, that the GOP nominee has the same disregard for norms of American democracy that Trump does. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 10:35 am
Kali Borkoski: Depending on whether your preferred party is in the minority or the majority, then the president’s inability to make recess appointments may seem either like an opportunity to encourage more political compromise, or it may seem like a sure sign of more political gridlock. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 6:20 am
Strategic employment of these tools makes it more difficult for Senators of all parties to obstruct Supreme Court nominees and helps to explain why the vast majority of such nominees during the past century have been confirmed by the Senate. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 6:00 am
Bush had extraordinary struggles putting nominees on the bench even with a Republican majority in the Senate as minority obstruction peaked. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 4:52 am
Schumer at that point is that a 4-to-4 court is a better long-term equilibrium for him than confirming a nominee of the other party will be exactly as defensible as current-Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s decision today that a 4-to-4 court is a better short-term equilibrium for him than confirming a nominee from Obama. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 5:34 pm
Senate confirms Trump’s Supreme Court pick Barrett in nearly party-line vote. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
In the beginning, of course, there were no political parties. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 7:20 am
The norm against court-packing is an important bulwark against their depredations – and those of the political majorities who put them in power. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
” And we have never seen anything like the numbers of people who say that they definitely will not vote for one or the other of the major party candidates.In fact, Enten argues, “If the numbers we’re seeing now…continue through the election, more Americans will dislike both major party nominees for president than ever before. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 4:57 am
Both parties soon initiated reforms to ensure that more voters had a direct role in choosing political nominees. [read post]
