Search for: "Non-Individual Defendants-Class II-d"
Results 41 - 60
of 297
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2012, 1:27 am
” Their model, described in their paper, “estimates (i) the probability of the settlement versus dismissal of a securities class action lawsuit and (ii) the amount for which the class action will settle conditional on the settlement. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
§ 1332(d). [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm
Beyond the Supreme Court, there was notable activity at the Circuit Courts of Appeals and district courts, including early applications of Halliburton II, application of Comcast in a securities class action, and significant decisions on scienter, loss causation and other securities issues. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:53 am
II. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 3:09 am
Supp. 2d 39 (D. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:21 pm
Seems plausible.But we'd still certify the class. [read post]
6 Aug 2016, 8:51 am
Most courts that have considered the claim that personal information has some intrinsic, non-statutory monetary value to the individual have rejected it, unmoved by revelations about high prices on the invisible illegal market, and usually noting that the plaintiffs have not alleged that they ever could have sold, or intended to sell, their personal information into such a market. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:16 am
Third, is this a class action? [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 10:07 am
I do this for each and every class day. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 12:26 pm
D. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 6:55 am
Because his class would include individuals who suffered a completely different injury the claims of its members lacked commonality. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 4:28 am
All the individual need prove is that the defendant polluted his/her property. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 7:51 am
" The department's proposal calls for retroactivity to be applied to defendants in Criminal History Categories I and II who did not receive (1) a mandatory minimum sentence for a firearms offense pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 11:22 am
II. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund that securities plaintiffs could bring class actions under the Securities Act of 1933 (“1933 Act”) in state courts.[1] The Court’s unanimous decision contrasts sharply with the rancor the ruling will cause: Cyan portends a paradigm shift in how defense lawyers defend securities class actions and D&O insurers cover and monitor them. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 9:05 pm
This purported class excludes non-U.S. investors who purchased their securities outside of the United States. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:43 am
Finally, there is also the issue of personal jurisdiction over the individual defendants, and perhaps even over the corporate defendant. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
II. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
II. [read post]
21 May 2009, 2:13 pm
Bexis' amendment, which the Reporters largely accepted, collects these reasons in one place and acknowledges non-certification as the most common result. [read post]
