Search for: "Non-Individual Defendants-Class II-d"
Results 61 - 80
of 297
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2007, 1:34 pm
Dow Chemical Co., 273 F.3d 249 (2d Cir. 2001), aff'd by equally divided court, 539 U.S. 111 (2003). [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 2:46 pm
Throughout the class period, the three individual defendants had made large trades in the company’s stock. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 1:30 pm
No one disputes that a district court’s prohibitory injunction against a defendant (including a governmental defendant) ordinarily applies “globally”—that is to say, it prohibits the defendant from acting upon the plaintiffs in the specified way wherever they may be found. [read post]
27 May 2021, 8:00 am
This certification is a purely administrative task, consisting of looking up an individual’s service record and verifying honorable service to date. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 5:10 pm
These suits present a number of challenges, including, among other things, questions arising in connection with D&O insurance coverage for the companies and individuals named as defendants in the lawsuits, particularly with respect to the price change exclusion, sometimes referred to as the “bump up” exclusion. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 9:48 pm
You'd probably expect that two guys whose idea of recreation includes commenting on drug and medical device product liability litigation would be members of the American Law Institute - and you'd be right. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 11:05 am
[iv] The cost to defend such allegations may be allocated or multiplied depending on the interested party involvement, particularly individual board members that might implicate Outside Director Liability cover. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm
Your attorney then will prepare a summons and have the defendants personally served with the Summons and Complaint.The defendant, must file an "Answer" within 35 days. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
[ii] In D.R. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 10:00 pm
Thus, any case given cy pres treatment, due to the expense or impossibility of proving causation and damages individually, necessarily can't qualify as a class action for money damages under Rule 23(b)(3) because the individual issues of causation and damages "predominate. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 1:55 pm
The Circuit Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss Count III, but denied its motion as to Counts I and II. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:10 am
Aside from marriage, I’d point to the interest in not being sterilized (compare Buck v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 1:52 pm
Peloton has additional registrations for (i) sports apparel; (ii) as a service mark for retail and online store services in the field of sports apparel, fitness equipment, and fitness classes; and (iii) for its stylized “P” logo. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:46 am
Claims for those damages must come, if at all, in the more individualized Phase II damages proceedings. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:36 am
(Aside for non-lawyers: “diverse” = plaintiff and defendants are citizens of different states; “non-diverse” = citizens of same state on both sides of the “v. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
Cratsley submits that New York law does not place a legal duty upon an individual who lacks control over the third party's actions. [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 9:08 am
First, insurers modified their standard D&O insurance policies to incorporate entity coverage, which eliminated many of the disputes over allocation between covered parties (individual directors and officer) and non-covered parties (before entity coverage, the company itself). [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 1:56 pm
For example, the presumptive options for Class D/Level II could be 59–83, 66–92, or 73–100, giving the court some room to tailor the sentence. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 4:54 am
The court that sentenced the defendant to a judicially sanctioned
drug treatment program may on its own motion, or on the defendant's
motion, ord [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
§ 1988 in an action based on a dismissal of a claim, when the plaintiff has asserted other interrelated and non-frivolous claims; and 2) whether it is improper to award defendants all of the attorney's fees they incurred in an action under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
