Search for: "Norfolk Southern Railway" Results 1 - 20 of 209
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, a sharply divided United States Supreme Court held that general-jurisdiction-by-registration statutes do not violate the Due Process Clause. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Norfolk Southern Railway Co., Wellness Int’l Network, Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:05 am by Stephen E. Sachs
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. and what it might mean for jurisdiction over interstate corporations. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. returns “dormant commerce” doctrine to the field—a place it occupied for several decades in the twentieth century, before being swept away and largely forgotten after International Shoe. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. returns “dormant commerce” doctrine to the field—a place it occupied for several decades in the twentieth century, before being swept away and largely forgotten after International Shoe. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Norfolk Southern Railway Co., ___ U.S.___ (June 27, 2023) in a 4-1-4 plurality decision. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 5:00 am
Norfolk Southern Railway, ___ U.S.___ (June 27, 2023) in a 4-1-4 plurality decision involving the validity of Pennsylvania’s “consent by registration” statute.In Mallory, the U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 5:30 am
Norfolk Southern Railway in which the United States Supreme Court addressed the validity of Pennsylvania's consent by registration statute. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 7:22 pm by Howard Bashman
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. (2023), the Second Circuit in Fuld v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am by Ralf Michaels
The EU Sustainability Directive and Jurisdiction The Draft for a Corporate Sustainable Due Diligence Directive currently contains no rules on jurisdiction. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
As was true last year, the recently completed Supreme Court Term was marked by several high-profile and contentious decisions in which a conservative 6-to-3 majority, for example, ended race-conscious affirmative action in higher education, scuttled President Biden’s student debt relief initiative, and found that the First Amendment protects a vendor’s refusal to design wedding websites for same-sex couples. [read post]