Search for: "O'Connor v. United States of America" Results 41 - 60 of 63
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2007, 8:32 pm
Here's a good passage written by Justice O'Connor that ties federalism to the protection of freedom (from Gregory v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Wei Li, Montefiore East Tremont Practice, Off¬Label Medical Device use by Surgeons Public Health Law Session 1E – Room 242Overarching Themes in Public Health LawModerator: Jonathan Todres, Georgia State University College of LawLance Gable, Wayne State University Law School, Public and Private Models of Public Health Governance in Trump’s AmericaLewis Grossman, American University Washington College of Law, The Taming of Progressive ‘State… [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:40 pm by Josh Blackman
I've now had a chance to review the oral argument in the Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 2:57 pm by Josh Blackman
Those young immigrants do not have legal status in the United States under current statutory law. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
 Additionally, the compilation below does not include reports on the Justices’ confirmation hearings – for example, Nomination of Sandra Day OConnor: Hearings Before the Judiciary of the United States (Sept. 9-11, 1981). [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
NASA has been irradiating astronauts' food successfully since the 1970s, but acceptance and availability of the technology for approved foods such as ground beef and poultry in the civilian market place has been limited despite the benefits recognized by the scientific and medical communities. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 8:15 am
Most men in America would not take this bargain, and they would feel the requirement of forced labor by the state as a serious imposition on their lives. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 12:25 pm
 And an odd lineup, which usually means something interesting was going on in the case:  Ginsburg joined by Stevens, Scalia, Souter, and Kennedy in the majority; Blackmun, Rehnquist, OConnor, and Thomas in dissent). [read post]
29 May 2018, 9:30 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Defendants argued that blocking is not state action because it simply utilizes functionality made available to every Twitter user. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Justices Sandra Day OConnor and Anthony Kennedy are gone, after all. [read post]