Search for: "Office Depot, Inc. " Results 61 - 80 of 281
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2013, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
New Orleans Depot Servs., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 5:48 pm
Office Depot, Inc., the Delaware courts allowed activist stockholders to exploit potential drafting ambiguities to circumvent the well-intended rationale of the advance notice bylaw. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 12:57 pm by Minken Employment Lawyers
Home Depot of Canada Inc. et. al. is a great reminder of this fundamental employment law concept. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
 (Voltstar) alleged that a product that Sakar manufactured and sold to Office Depot, Inc. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 6:38 am by Kaufman Dolowich Voluck
Marc Voses, partner in the Kaufman Dolowich and Voluck New York City office, wrote an article on cyber insurance trends which was published by PIA Magazine in the December 2017 issue. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 6:49 pm by Eric Schweibenz
– San Antonio d/b/a InkSell.com of San Antonio, Texas Atman, Inc. s/b/a pcRUSH.com of El Segundo, California Dexxxon Digital Storage, Inc. of Lewis Center, Ohio Discount Office Items, Inc. of Columbus, Wisconsin Deal Express LLC d/b/a Discount Office Items of Columbus, Wisconsin Do It Wiser LLC d/b/a Image Toner of Marietta, Georgia E-Max Group, Inc. d/b/a Databazaar.com of Miramar, Florida Green Project, Inc. of Hacienda Heights,… [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 12:47 am
Office Depot, Inc., 404 F .3d 1232, 1238 (10th Cir.2005) was the only circuit authority on the meaning of "commenced" in CAFA. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 8:01 pm by The Clinton Law Firm
In the underlying case, a plaintiff alleged that a product manufactured and sold by Sakar to Office Depot violated plaintiff’s patent.The case was eventually settled. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 10:16 pm
Office Depot, Inc., 360 F.Supp.2d 1176, 1180 (D.Colo.2005), but a number of other district courts had held, in cases decided shortly after Congress raised the amount in controversy requirement for diversity cases, that "commenced" means the date on which a case is removed to federal court. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 6:08 am by Dennis Crouch
Office Depot, Inc. et al., No. 15-461 (Kessler doctrine – enhanced preclusion) Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 4:22 am
On March 14, 2008, Office Depot sent out its notice of annual meeting. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:43 am by Dennis Crouch
Office Depot, Inc. et al., No. 15-461 (Kesslerdoctrine – enhanced preclusion) Preclusion or Jurisdiction: ePlus, Inc. v. [read post]