Search for: "Office of Disability Adjudication & Review"
Results 1 - 20
of 480
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Trump, supra, 928 F. 3d at 236, focusing on whether the social media site functions as a “tool of governance” “swathe[d] in the trappings of [the official’s] office,” see, Davison v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:31 am
Applicant claimed her industrial injury caused permanent and total disability. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
And he's challenging that conviction in federal court to say, well, I my conviction is invalid because it was adjudicated issued by a judge who was barred from holding office by Section 3. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 7:16 am
And he's challenging that conviction in federal court to say, well, I my conviction is invalid because it was adjudicated issued by a judge who was barred from holding office by Section 3. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds ofeach House, remove such disability. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
United States: the states are disabled from legislating in this area of federal interest. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm
Early on, a good chunk of time was also spent on Mitchell's creative argument that Section 3 cannot be enforced until an official has actually taken office, because until then Congress can also lift his disability by a 2/3 majority vote of each House. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Accordingly, it’s simply inaccurate to say, as the Daines amicus brief does (at page 14), that “the Colorado Supreme Court extended any section 3 disability beyond ‘be[ing]’ President to also merely running for President. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 2:02 pm
Accordingly, it’s simply inaccurate to say, as the Daines amicus brief does (at page 14), that “the Colorado Supreme Court extended any section 3 disability beyond ‘be[ing]’ President to also merely running for President. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:19 am
This includes state and federal courts, which have adjudicated Section Three questions in the past and continue to do so. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm
Specific limitations and exceptions are no better, and hard fought over years through (captured) regimes like WIPO or Copyright Office triennial review. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
A hearing officer was appointed and ultimately the hearing officer issued a determination rejecting Petitioner's application for General Municipal Law §207-c benefits due to a lack substantial evidence. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
A hearing officer was appointed and ultimately the hearing officer issued a determination rejecting Petitioner's application for General Municipal Law §207-c benefits due to a lack substantial evidence. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
CONGRESS REMOVED ANY ELECTORAL DISABILITY VIA THE 1872 AND 1898 AMNESTY ACTS Amicus brief of Devin Watkins and Charles Watkins I. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm
On habeas review, the district court held that Smith was intellectually disabled, noting among other things that because his 72 score had a 3-point margin of error, his IQ could be as low as 69. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
The Court said that only the Commission had the authority to adjudicate medical exam disputes under the statutes. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
Other WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review Bundy (Tylor) v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Modernizing Regulatory Review May 15, 2023| K. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 9:11 am
In this same vein, CMS proposes to codify its authority to (1) review and deny approval of an MA organization’s bid if the MA organization has failed to demonstrate, via relevant acceptable evidence, that its proposed SSBCI has a reasonable expectation of improving or maintaining the health or overall function of a chronically ill enrollee; and (2) review SSBCI offerings annually for compliance purposes. [read post]
