Search for: "Office of the Attorney General v. Justice Court" Results 81 - 100 of 6,151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2013, 9:43 am
“In my opinion, when the legislation is considered separately and cumulatively, it cannot be said that there is an express or necessarily implied requirement that a person appointed to the office of the Attorney General be a member of the Bar of British Columbia for five years or even be qualified to practice law,” wrote Justice Elizabeth Bennett in Askin v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The Special Counsel may be disciplined or removed from office only by the personal action of the Attorney General. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 11:31 pm by Allan Blutstein
Department of Justice, Attorney General Garland, U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm by Rachel Bercovitz, Todd Carney
These include attorney-client and executive privileges. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
  This statute was mentioned by the Court in 1988 as support for its opinion in the famous independent counsel case, Morrison v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 10:52 am by MBettman
Should Justice Pat DeWine have recused himself in cases in which the Attorney General’s office, led by his father, either appeared as a party, or as an amicus? [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 1:53 pm by John A. Emmons
The Justice Department on Tuesday released a Tampa Grand Jury’s indictment in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 10:54 am by Andrew Hamm
Finally, Justice Tom Clark made a familial sacrifice, retiring when his son, Ramsey Clark, became the attorney general in 1967. [read post]
14 May 2008, 1:20 pm
CLEMENT TO LEAVE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON - Today, the Department of Justice announced that Solicitor General Paul D. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:01 am by Amy Howe
Over a dissent from Justice Clarence Thomas, the justices denied review in Daniel v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
Following the release of orders, the Court will hear argument in District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District, et al. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Abbott Laboratories v. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Dennison secured an opinion from Ohio’s Attorney General, who took the view that the Extradition Clause covered only those acts which were crimes under the law of the asylum State, or which were “regarded as malum in se by the general judgment and conscience of civilized nations. [read post]