Search for: "Officer John Doe #5" Results 121 - 140 of 3,688
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2013, 9:13 am by Ken
”); Dkt 108-5, at 58:21-25 (wherein the Court implies officers of the court have knowingly made misrepresentations to the court). [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 8:30 pm by Jim Sedor
Lawmakers will not be able to use campaign money or congressional office budget funds to pay the fines. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 11:21 am by Ron Coleman
 John Doe #2, perhaps, gets the benefit of Supreme Court rule-making, according to this opinion; but first John Doe #1 has to have his cover blown. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 1:17 pm
The driver of the vehicle was John Dowling, a Volusia County Beach Patrol Officer. [read post]
26 May 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Chief Justice John Roberts Defends Supreme Court’s ‘Highest Standards of Conduct,’ Offers No New Rules ABC News – Devin Dwyer | Published: 5/24/2023 Chief Justice John Roberts defended the integrity of the Supreme Court in the face of slumping public approval and growing political pressure after a recent barrage of misconduct allegations. [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 11:36 pm
While John Yoo is no longer deputy assistant attorney general forthe Bush administration's Office of Legal Counsel he is still a professorat UC Berkeley's Boalt Law School. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:01 am by Michael Lowe
The Government, however, believed that the Jane Does simply didn’t have “standing” to bring a federal lawsuit even though the CVRA (d)(5) specifically authorizes a crime victim to make an application to “re-open” a plea deal if the NPA was violated. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:00 am by John Zarych
The Atlantic City disorderly conduct defense attorneys at The Law Offices of John J. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:44 am by D. Kappos
  5) FILE THOROUGH RESPONSES:  Take care to ensure that your response addresses the specific issues set forth in the examiner’s office action. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:35 pm by Wolfgang Demino
But the Vacancies Act, by its own terms, does not apply where another statute “expressly . . . designates an officer or employee to perform the functions and duties of a specified office temporarily in an acting capacity,” 5 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:35 pm by Wolfgang Demino
But the Vacancies Act, by its own terms, does not apply where another statute “expressly . . . designates an officer or employee to perform the functions and duties of a specified office temporarily in an acting capacity,” 5 U.S.C. [read post]