Search for: "Officer Olmstead"
Results 81 - 100
of 113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2010, 7:00 am
The recent decision of Olmstead v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 6:49 am
Under secondary laws, an officer must have some other reason to stop a vehicle before citing a driver for using a cellphone. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:39 am
Now it is the Office for People With Developmental Disabilities. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:23 am
Olmstead v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 6:00 pm
The Supreme Court in Olmstead V. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 1:38 pm
Police departments might discipline an officer for an egregious violation of the Fourth Amendment, but not the small ones. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 1:10 pm
In a fact-specific setting of a law enforcement officer using his government-provided pager during work hours to send personal messages, the Court rules that an employer review of the messages for budgetary reasons is “reasonable” under the Fourth Amendment. 1) FEDERAL SENTENCING (upholding mandatory limit on sentence reductions for new, retroactive guidelines). [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 12:20 pm
See, e.g., Olmstead v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 11:31 am
All parties agree that Zervos’ GML § 207-a benefits resumed as of September 16, 2008.In February 2009, a hearing was held and the hearing officer issued a decision concluding that the January 30, 2008 termination date for Zervos’ GML § 207-a benefits was proper.On December 8, 2009, Judge Lebous issued a Decision upholding Hearing Officer Olmstead's decision. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 2:12 pm
Keep your data only locally on equipment in your home or office, and the police need a warrant to look at or take it. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 10:33 am
The Supreme Court reversed Olmstead in Katz.) [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 4:58 am
As I’ve noted in earlier posts, that argument has, as far as I can tell, consistently succeeded in cases in which officers use P2P software to locate child porn on someone’s computers. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
” Olmstead v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:57 am
GPS doesn't require the observer to leave the office. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 12:20 am
October 23, 2009): It cannot be gainsaid that the Fourth Amendment protects, as Justice Brandeis' oft-cited observation points out, "the right to be let alone," Olmstead v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 5:03 pm
As I have previously explained, in a New York Driving While Intoxicated case where a blood test is directed by a police officer, only a physician, a registered nurse or a physician's assistant my draw the blood unsupervised. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 11:31 pm
Olmstead v. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 5:54 am
Supreme Court's landmark decision in Olmstead v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 9:09 am
"Cook public defender wants death penalty removed in 60 cases," by Rob Olmstead and Barbara Vitello appears in today's Chicago Daily Herald.The Cook County Public Defender is filing motions to remove the death penalty as an option in about 60 murder cases because the office is out of money to pay expert witnesses in those cases, it announced Wednesday.And:The earliest additional funds would be available is October 2009. [read post]
12 May 2009, 7:59 am
The opinion even quotes Brandeis' 1928 Olmstead dissent on the right to be let alone: The protection guaranteed by the Amendments [the Fourth and Fifth] is much broader in scope [than the protection of property]. [read post]
