Search for: "One Clothing Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 1,647
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2024, 1:28 pm
But the judge in that case, Juan Merchan, has also admitted evidence of other payments, made by American Media Inc.... that the prosecution says establish motive, intent, and what it describes as a broader conspiracy to sway the election. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 4:01 am
A TTAB judge once said to me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) appeal 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the involved goods/services. [read post]
Written by Christina Catenacci, BA, LLB, LLM, PhD, Content Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 4:07 am
"] In re Cuts Clothing, Inc., Serial No. 90880357 (April 4, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas W. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 8:29 am by jeffreynewmanadmin
At Mohamed Ghacham’s direction, Chinese suppliers would prepare two invoices for the clothing ordered by Ghacham Inc. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
All in all, the plaintiff had no access to running water for around 17 hours, went without any shower or access to soap for around 30 hours, and remained in “soiled” clothing for about 23 hours. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 12:01 pm by Eugene Volokh
In the words of the California Supreme Court in Balboa Village Island Inn, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:53 am by Evan Lim
Neenah, Inc., Avery Products Corporation, No. 2022-1333, 2022-1334, 2022-1427, 2022-1432 (Fed. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 2:50 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
One reporting manager was transferred, received a reduction in pay, and was subsequently terminated for standing up against harassment. [read post]
As we previously reported here, the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) upended years of settled law in Tesla, Inc., 370 NLRB No. 131 (2022), when it held that employers cannot restrict employees from displaying union insignia (e.g., buttons, clothing, pins, and stickers) on their clothing at work, absent a showing of “special circumstances”—a nearly impossible standard for employers to meet. [read post]
As we previously reported here, the National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) upended years of settled law in Tesla, Inc., 370 NLRB No. 131 (2022), when it held that employers cannot restrict employees from displaying union insignia (e.g., buttons, clothing, pins, and stickers) on their clothing at work, absent a showing of “special circumstances”—a nearly impossible standard for employers to meet. [read post]