Search for: "One West Real Estate Inc"
Results 21 - 40
of 311
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm
Young EnergyServe Inc. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
The City argued the project was ineligible for the following reasons: (1) the project violated the City’s requirements that projects meet certain performance standards for off-site impacts and not exceed certain amount and intensity of use requirements; (2) the project was located within a three-block area designated as a City Landmark for the state-listed historical resource known as the West Berkeley Shellmound (“Shellmound”), and would have, thus, violated the… [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
The City argued the project was ineligible for the following reasons: (1) the project violated the City’s requirements that projects meet certain performance standards for off-site impacts and not exceed certain amount and intensity of use requirements; (2) the project was located within a three-block area designated as a City Landmark for the state-listed historical resource known as the West Berkeley Shellmound (“Shellmound”), and would have, thus, violated the… [read post]
18 Sep 2021, 6:42 am
That real estate can be held in a variety of ways based on how the deed to the real estate is conveyed to the married couple. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:27 am
Levitt, LLC43 West Blackwell StreetDover, NJ 07801-3848Counsel for Defendants, Joseph Russo, Jr. and the Estate of Joseph Russo, Sr.Michael P. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
As a responsible agency, the District argued CEQA Guidelines section 15096, subdivision (e), required the Board to either accept the adequacy of the EIR as-is, or take one of three actions: (i) file suit challenging the EIR, (ii) prepare a subsequent EIR, if allowed under CEQA Guidelines section 15162, or (iii) assume the lead agency role of the original EIR. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 12:51 am
As a responsible agency, the District argued CEQA Guidelines section 15096, subdivision (e), required the Board to either accept the adequacy of the EIR as-is, or take one of three actions: (i) file suit challenging the EIR, (ii) prepare a subsequent EIR, if allowed under CEQA Guidelines section 15162, or (iii) assume the lead agency role of the original EIR. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. [read post]
24 May 2021, 6:31 am
According to a BrokerCheck report several of the customer complaints concern alternative investments such as direct participation products (DPPs) like business development companies (BDCs), non-traded real estate investment trusts (REITs), oil & gas programs, annuities, and private placements. [read post]
3 May 2021, 8:43 am
Bringing to mind the infamous Hatfield-McCoy family feud, Concho Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 8:43 am
Bringing to mind the infamous Hatfield-McCoy family feud, Concho Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Observers said the unusual step is likely due to West not fully disclosing his wife’s income and assets. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 4:07 pm
On April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in the matter of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
” Jason Greene was an entrepreneur, “having his hands in a little bit of everything, primarily real estate and money management issues. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
West (Georgia), Barbara Woodhouse (Emory), and me (UCLA), plus the Firearms Policy Coalition and the Georgia First Amendment Foundation. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm
Like I said, this one is an easy victory for me. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 1:52 pm
In 2018 the California Supreme Court held in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. vs. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 9:03 am
AB 5, which went into effect January 1, 2020, codified in the Labor Code the “ABC” test for determining independent contractor status that the California Supreme Court adopted in its 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
