Search for: "Osram Sylvania"
Results 1 - 20
of 52
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2020, 8:56 am
The case starts with Photographic Illustrators Corp (PIC), a commercial photography service that did work for Osram Sylvania, a lightbulb manufacturer. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 1:51 pm
Osram Sylvania, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 18-1445-RGA (D.Del. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:32 am
Incandescent Light bulb Phase-out Starting things off, NBCNews took note that most Americans aren't even aware that their traditional light sources will soon become a rare commodity with the Jan. 1 deadline to end production of 60- and 40-watt incandescent light bulbs according to lighting manufacturer Osram Sylvania’s recently released sixth annual "Sylvania Socket Survey," which found that [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 6:06 am
In Osram Sylvania Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 8:00 am
OSRAM Sylvania, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:48 pm
(collectively, “Samsung”) and Respondents OSRAM AG, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors GmbH, and OSRAM Sylvania, Inc. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 1:10 am
Osram Sylvania, Inc., 504 F.3d 1223, 1234 (Fed. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:00 pm
By way of background, on March 23, 2012, LG responded to Respondents OSRAM AG, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors GmbH, and OSRAM Sylvania, Inc. [read post]
31 May 2012, 5:38 pm
OSRAM states that it has devoted substantial resources in the United States, including investments in domestic engineering and research and development ("R&D") of products incorporating LEDs, at its two domestic subsidiaries, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors, Inc. and OSRAM Sylvania Inc. [read post]
24 May 2012, 4:16 pm
In the Order, ALJ Rogers granted Respondents OSRAM AG, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors GmbH, and OSRAM Sylvania, Inc. [read post]
21 May 2012, 11:48 am
According to the Order, OSRAM argued that it devoted substantial resources in the United States, including investments in domestic engineering and research and development of products incorporating LEDs, at its two domestic subsidiaries, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors, Inc. and OSRAM Sylvania Inc. [read post]
2 May 2012, 6:13 am
’s (“Samsung”) motion to disqualify Respondents OSRAM AG, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors GmbH, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors Inc., and OSRAM Sylvania Inc. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 8:13 am
Rogers, Jr. issued the public version of Order No. 12 (dated March 14, 2012) denying Respondents’ OSRAM AG, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors GmbH, and OSRAM Sylvania, Inc. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 9:48 am
In the Order, ALJ Rogers granted nonparty Nichai America Corporation’s (“NAC”) motion to quash subpoenas duces tecum and ad testificandum issued by respondents Osram AG, Osram Opto Semiconductor GmbH, Osram opto Semiconductors Inc., and Osram Sylvania Inc. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:17 pm
Osram Sylvania Inc., which is part of Siemens AG, claimed the product infringed its “Icetron lighting system” patent, and sued American Induction in 2009 in U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 5:25 pm
According to the Order, Respondents OSRAM AG, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors GmbH, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors Inc., and OSRAM Sylvania Inc. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 7:09 am
(“SLED”) filed a motion to compel Respondents OSRAM GmbH, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors GmbH, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors Inc., and OSRAM Sylvania Inc. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 9:52 pm
., OSRAM GmbH, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors GmbH of Germany, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors Inc., and OSRAM Sylvania Inc., named by Complainants Samsung LED Co., Ltd. of Korea and Samsung LED America, Inc. of Atlanta, Georgia). [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 9:57 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as respondents in this investigation: • OSRAM Gmbh of Germany, • OSRAM Sylvania Inc. of Danvers, Massachusetts, and • OSRAM Opto Semiconductors Gmbh of Germany In addition, acting Chief ALJ Charles E. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 4:09 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified OSRAM GmbH of Germany, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors GmbH of Germany, OSRAM Opto Semiconductors Inc. of Sunnyvale, California, and OSRAM Sylvania Inc. of Danvers, Massachusetts as the respondents in this investigation. [read post]
