Search for: "Other Defendants-Class III-a, Class III-b, Class III-c"
Results 1 - 20
of 474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2017, 10:52 am
” In Johnston, the defendants brought their motion to dismiss for lack of Article III standing at the pleadings stage under Rule 12(b)(1). [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:39 am
After providing a thorough analysis under Rules 23(a), 23(b)(1), and 23(b)(3), the Court declined to certify the two putative classes. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
C. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 5:30 am
[xv] B. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 9:45 am
Inquiries, other than requests for the Notice, may be made to Lead Counsel: Steven B. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 3:28 pm
Semenko maintained that she wanted to return to work, but Wendy’s refused to accommodate her by (i) reassigning her to other available positions, or (iii) providing her a reasonable extension on her medical leave. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 5:04 pm
In Murray the elements of a NDNC claim ((A) a residential telephone subscriber; (B) that received more than one telephonic solicitation; (C) by or on behalf of the same entity; (D) during a twelve-month period; (E) to a number that the subscriber registered on the NDNC registry) differed significantly from the elements of an automated dialer claim ((i) at least one call is made; (ii) using an automatic telephone dialing system; (iii) without the consent of the called… [read post]
3 May 2023, 8:44 am
The McGoveran decision illustrates how Article III standing should remain the operative focus of any privacy class action defense. [read post]
3 May 2023, 8:44 am
The McGoveran decision illustrates how Article III standing should remain the operative focus of any privacy class action defense. [read post]
3 May 2023, 8:44 am
The McGoveran decision illustrates how Article III standing should remain the operative focus of any privacy class action defense. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
”[xix] B. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:34 am
¶ 7.C. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 4:44 pm
Certification under the Class Proceedings Act requires that a number of requirements described at section 5(1) of the Act be present: 5(1) The court shall certify a class proceeding on a motion under section 2, 3 or 4 if,(a) the pleadings or the notice of application discloses a cause of action;(b) there is an identifiable class of two or more persons that would be represented by the representative plaintiff or… [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 1:12 pm
§ 360c(b)(2). [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 7:01 am
By Joseph C. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 3:44 pm
A second similar offense increases the grade of offense to a class B felony. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:14 am
’ ” Unlike a case in which the impact of the phrase “The Better Vitamin C”—akin to puffery—couldn’t be disentangled from other non-misleading representations on the label, flushability was sufficiently distinctive that it could be isolated from other label claims.The common questions:(1) What do defendants’ “flushable” representations mean to a reasonable consumer? [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 2:16 pm
C. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 5:57 am
All defendants moved for dismissal of the class action complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) and Rule 9(b), id. [read post]
6 May 2007, 11:22 am
As a resource for the class action defense lawyer who defends against securities class action litigation, we provide the text of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PSLRA). [read post]
