Search for: "P.J. Express" Results 1 - 20 of 69
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2023, 7:01 pm
Under the express terms the Sovereign Immunity Act, sovereign immunity is only waived in actions against the Commonwealth for damages arising out of a negligent acts. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 11:37 am
I reserve my right First Amendment right to express disagreement. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 1:37 pm
Musante (l980) 102 Cal.App.3d 156, 159, conc. opn. of Gardner, P.J. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The primary questions before the Court of Appeal: Whether there was [1] a failure to follow the prescribed constitutional procedure that warrants invalidation of the results of the legislature's process followed in creating the congressional and state senate maps; and [2] whether there is record support for the determination of both courts below that the district lines for congressional races were drawn with an unconstitutional partisan intent. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The primary questions before the Court of Appeal: Whether there was [1] a failure to follow the prescribed constitutional procedure that warrants invalidation of the results of the legislature's process followed in creating the congressional and state senate maps; and [2] whether there is record support for the determination of both courts below that the district lines for congressional races were drawn with an unconstitutional partisan intent. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
When the Plaintiff later changed insurance agents, the Plaintiff expressed that she wished to continue to have full tort coverage. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 3:33 am by SHG
That would be entirely understandable at P.J. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 1:01 am by Simon Lester
The authors also affirm that they do not want to express themselves on the merits of the US objections beyond signaling that other Members disagree strongly, thus taking these objections de facto as given. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 2:29 am by Walter Olson
Those who are offended shouldn’t have a veto over free expression and putative offenders should be judged in the court of public opinion. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 5:11 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Here, the court concluded, section 11.3 of the license agreement “clearly expresses the contracting parties’ intention that the license not create any third-party beneficiaries. [read post]