Search for: "P.J. Express" Results 61 - 69 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2019, 1:01 am by Simon Lester
The authors also affirm that they do not want to express themselves on the merits of the US objections beyond signaling that other Members disagree strongly, thus taking these objections de facto as given. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 11:18 am by Rick
[A] subsequent expression of the Legislature as to the intent of the prior statute, although not binding on the court, may properly be used in determining the effect of a prior act.10 However, In general, a legislator’s personal understanding of a bill does not indicate the Legislature’s collective intent in enacting that bill.11 Vas [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
It comes as no surprise that the Supreme Court of Georgia rejected constitutional challenges to the Daubert rule on expert testimony in the newly released decision of Mason v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The primary questions before the Court of Appeal: Whether there was [1] a failure to follow the prescribed constitutional procedure that warrants invalidation of the results of the legislature's process followed in creating the congressional and state senate maps; and [2] whether there is record support for the determination of both courts below that the district lines for congressional races were drawn with an unconstitutional partisan intent. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The primary questions before the Court of Appeal: Whether there was [1] a failure to follow the prescribed constitutional procedure that warrants invalidation of the results of the legislature's process followed in creating the congressional and state senate maps; and [2] whether there is record support for the determination of both courts below that the district lines for congressional races were drawn with an unconstitutional partisan intent. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:07 pm
” But the probate court again expressed that it did not have jurisdiction over claims of adverse title.*2 Thereafter, counsel for the widow again stated that the parties “all agreed to stipulate as to the amount and nature of the property, that [this] was proper and then they have claims that their two pieces of property—the bank’s one [money-market account] and [the parents’] four [pieces of contested property][—]are not part of the estate. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 1:17 pm
Heller sued the City; Greg Shepard, a Vehicle for Hire Inspector employed by the City in the Atlanta Police Department’s Bureau of Taxicabs and Vehicles for Hire ("Taxi Bureau"), who inspected the taxicab; the state Department of Transportation ("DOT"), which maintained the roadway; Abdallah Adem, the cab driver; and United Express Cab Co. [read post]