Search for: "PACK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" Results 1 - 20 of 195
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2022, 6:11 am by Gabriel Schoenfeld
” Today, in one of those remarkable inversions of history, the charge that the United States is totalitarian no longer comes from the left but the right, from America’s growing contingent of self-proclaimed “post-liberal” intellectuals. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:19 pm by John A. Gallagher
Kennedy announced the Court's 5-4 ruling making same-sex marriage lawful in every state in the United States of America. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Tia Sewell
The president had made clear his intentions from the start: Upset about critical coverage of his administration from the USAGM’s subsidiaries, Trump stated that the Senate’s failure to confirm Pack was “preventing us from managing the Voice of America. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]
A majority of fed cattle in the United States are sold to packing plants and processed into various beef products. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
New York also has one of the highest state cigarette taxes ($4.35 per pack), not counting the additional local New York City cigarette tax ($1.50 per pack). [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:53 am by SHG
United States, the law at stake was the Armed Career Criminal Act, and let’s face it, who loves armed career criminals? [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 12:00 am
If such a device existed, it would have broken on Thursday, when the government gave its closing argument in the case of United States of America v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:25 am by Nexsen Pruet
The opinion issued by the Supreme Court of the United States in that consolidated appeal is known as Brown v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:55 pm by Mark Walsh
There is no authority in the Constitution of the United States or in this Court’s precedents for the Judiciary to set aside Michigan laws that commit this policy determination to the voters. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 8:39 am by Andrew Frisch
For this reason, and because it is from the United States’ highest court, wage and hour practitioners would be wise to read the entire decision. [read post]