Search for: "PARTY CITY HOLDINGS, INC." Results 1 - 20 of 2,296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2008, 1:03 am
Court hold that the terms of a collective bargaining agreement permits employee organization to demand arbitration of a grievance on behalf of retirees Matter of City of Niagara Falls v Niagara Falls Police Club, Inc., 2008 NY Slip Op 05459, Decided on June 13, 2008, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentThe City of Niagara Falls resisted efforts by the Niagara Falls Police Club to submit a grievance concerning healthcare benefits for retired police officers to… [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 12:16 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Lannett Holdings Inc., 893 F.3d 1372,1382 (Fed. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 7:39 am by Patricia Salkin
The parties presented conflicting expert testimony as to the economic viability of the property. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 6:30 am by John McFarland
” Justice Boyd would hold otherwise with respect to the City’s right to construct access roads. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 2:29 pm by Chuck Becker
 If the holding catches on, it should scare the sewage out of every city in the country. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
  American Trucking follows closely on the heals of another FAAAA preemption decision, Dan’s City Used Cars, Inc., v. [read post]
Door Dash, Inc. filed a complaint in the Southern District of New York on Wednesday over a new ordinance the company says violates customer privacy. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 9:14 pm by Scott McKeown
CAFC Holds PTAB Joinder Decisions Reviewable Back in March, the Windy City panel (Prost, Plager, and O’Malley) originally held that § 315(c) was unambiguous that an existing “party” to a PTAB proceeding cannot be joined as a party. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 5:41 am by Patricia Salkin
Stewart Enterprises, Inc. v City of Oakland, 2016 WL 3453650 (CA 6/23/2016)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Vested Rights [read post]