Search for: "PARTY CITY HOLDINGS, INC."
Results 1 - 20
of 2,296
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2021, 6:51 pm
City of West Palm Beach, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 10:44 am
In Dominus/Cityzen Brampton SWQRP Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 1:03 am
Court hold that the terms of a collective bargaining agreement permits employee organization to demand arbitration of a grievance on behalf of retirees Matter of City of Niagara Falls v Niagara Falls Police Club, Inc., 2008 NY Slip Op 05459, Decided on June 13, 2008, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentThe City of Niagara Falls resisted efforts by the Niagara Falls Police Club to submit a grievance concerning healthcare benefits for retired police officers to… [read post]
17 May 2013, 8:00 am
Dan’s City Used Cars, Inc., v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 2:06 pm
City of Yucaipa (Target Stores, Inc., Real Party In Interest) (4th Dist., Div. 2, 2015) ____ Cal.App.4th ____, 2015 WL 3564971. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 12:16 am
Lannett Holdings Inc., 893 F.3d 1372,1382 (Fed. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 4:05 am
In Pass-A-Grille Beach Community Church, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 7:39 am
The parties presented conflicting expert testimony as to the economic viability of the property. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:34 am
(See City of San Jose v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 6:30 am
” Justice Boyd would hold otherwise with respect to the City’s right to construct access roads. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 2:29 pm
If the holding catches on, it should scare the sewage out of every city in the country. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:34 am
So holds Medytox Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
’s and LAN, Inc. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
American Trucking follows closely on the heals of another FAAAA preemption decision, Dan’s City Used Cars, Inc., v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 10:57 am
Door Dash, Inc. filed a complaint in the Southern District of New York on Wednesday over a new ordinance the company says violates customer privacy. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 9:14 pm
CAFC Holds PTAB Joinder Decisions Reviewable Back in March, the Windy City panel (Prost, Plager, and O’Malley) originally held that § 315(c) was unambiguous that an existing “party” to a PTAB proceeding cannot be joined as a party. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:45 am
City of Concord, 162 F.R.D. 603, 619 (N.D.Cal.1995)(quoting Cumis Ins. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 5:41 am
Stewart Enterprises, Inc. v City of Oakland, 2016 WL 3453650 (CA 6/23/2016)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Vested Rights [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:00 am
In Discovery Builders, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 3:58 am
What the Future Holds for China, Inc. [read post]