Search for: "PARTY X v. PARTY Y"
Results 21 - 40
of 458
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
X, the social network that used to be known as Twitter, updated its privacy policy to include collection of users’ biometric data. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 3:29 pm
” “I’m going to direct your attention to page X, line Y. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Credit Union v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:12 pm
Stickman IV's opinion in Doe v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 12:01 am
Y. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 3:27 pm
But that's not a divorce case at all, and is instead a normal writ proceeding that merely holds that when the petitioner asks only for X in its writ (there, to not produce some documents), the trial court doesn't have jurisdiction to grant petitioner an alternative, Y, that the writ petition never requested (there, to redact the documents instead). [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 4:32 pm
There (at [165]), the judge imagined a scenario where ‘X tells an assembly of people at a meeting that he has evidence that Y has murdered Z, his wife, who has been missing. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 4:50 pm
The party proffering the expert witness must show that “the witness’s opinion is not be based on speculation or conjecture” Volpe v. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
An ordinal function tells us that individual i prefers possible world X to possible world Y, but it doesn't tell us whether X is much better than Y or only a little better. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 8:47 am
As I’ll show, United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
(Editor’s Note: The authors share their insights on U.S. government classification and declassification process on the Just Security Podcast. [read post]
27 May 2023, 10:44 am
Precedents like Train v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 6:38 am
The judge reviewed the national case law on selections/deletions from multiple lists (Merck v Shionogi [2016] EWHC 2989 (Pat), Nokia v IPCom [2012] EWCA Civ 567 and GlaxoSmithKline v Wyeth [2016] EWHC 1045 (Pat)) and the EPO cases reviewed therein and in the EPO Case Law Book. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:09 pm
Now there are three parties here we can think about. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 2:22 pm
App'x 728, 731–32 (2d Cir. 2020). [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:20 am
This right allowed Waystar to repurchase the LP units “during the six (6) month period following (x) the (i) [t]ermination of [Weinberg’s] employment with the Service Recipient for any reason … and (y) a Restrictive Covenant Breach. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Cette preuve a toutefois été utilisée comme preuve de faits similaires pour démontrer la présence de X et de Y dans le bureau. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 2:36 pm
Company Y agrees to buy X for $80 million and promises that X’s shareholders will be made whole. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:15 am
(2) Behar v. [read post]
