Search for: "PETER B"
Results 81 - 100
of 3,874
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2023, 7:14 am
” 2) “An Apple is not an Apple”, at least according to the Swiss Federal Administrative Court… by Peter Schramm “With Judgment of 8 March 2023 (B-1974/2022), the Swiss Federal Administrative Court confirmed the rejection of an opposition by Apple against a trademark showing another stylized apple motif. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:43 am
One could, I suppose, argue that deficits harm future innocents, except that (a) there is no evidence that they do (at least as the US has seen over its history), and (b) it is possible -- indeed morally required -- for future non-starving people to prevent people (including children) from starving today. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:03 am
‘Our primary filing was a request under Rule 262.1(b) of the UPC Rules of Procedure requesting that the Munich section of the central division make available to us all written pleadings and evidence filed on case no ACT_464985/2023. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:59 am
Sign up to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:04 am
In a future release, for each member of the legal team, it will be possible to indicate whether: a) The representative must receive notifications and at which email address. b) The user is the representative or one of the representatives and therefore such user’s name will appear in documents created by the CMS. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am
By Barbie Kim Philip de Montebello is the Fiske Kimball Professor in the History and Culture of Museums at the Institute of Fine Arts, New York University. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 4:55 am
Quick links Peter Edge, Edgelawblog: The Isle of Man Constitution Bill 2023 Neil Foster, Law and Religion Australia: New NSW “Religious Vilification” law: on an amendment to the New South Wales Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 making certain types of speech connected with religion unlawful which came into effect on 11 November 2023. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 7:04 am
Peters v. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 1:42 am
In addressing this question, the court referred to paragraphs 12 and 13 of Novartis Division Bench judgement and clarified that S. 3(d) is not limited in its application to pharmacology but its explanation is limited thereto and also referred to paragraphs 82, 87 and 157 of the Supreme Court publications of the Novartis judgement and pronounced that it does not follow from the determination of SC judgement that S. 3(d) applies only to pharmaceutical and agrochemical substances and not to biochemical… [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 3:03 pm
Peter Mavrick is a Miami business litigation lawyer, and represents clients in Fort Lauderdale, Boca Raton, and Palm Beach. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am
Gardner,Peter L. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 6:14 am
It also changed the name of Zen Palate Union Square LLC to Platinum Z, Inc. d/b/a Zen Palate, but the caption was never actually amended, as the stipulation was not “so-ordered,” and the judgment was not actually vacated. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
Researching whether the persons responsible for Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment thought the president was an officer of the United States is a bit like researching whether George Washington had five fingers on his right hand. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
However, due to a change in the draft Rules of Procedure prior to their adoption, the pleadings and evidence are not automatically made available to the public, and a third party must make a reasoned request for access under Rule 262(1)(b) RoP. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 12:23 am
Furthermore, the proposal suggests deleting the problematic part of “when a reference medicinal product is used” in the preamble and incorporates both “offering” and additionally also “export” as falling under the activities in point (a), notably without the optional use of the word “may” under point (b). [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 4:18 am
Briefly, the judge summarised the principle that where the patentee says in the description that the technical effect identified can be achieved either by means A or B but goes on to claim only means B, this is a clear indication from the patentee that means A does not fall within the scope of the claims, whether as a matter of normal construction or equivalence. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 2:37 am
By Barbie Kim This article investigates copyright’s role in the afterlife of the photograph Tomoko and Mother in the Bath by American photojournalist W. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:49 am
In what appears ended up as a pro-se breach of fiduciary duty law suit, in Pacelli v Peter L. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
Moderated by Peter Karol, UNH Franklin Pierce School of Law RT: Organized my remarks in response to the oral arguments in Elster, hopefully not too repetitive. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 11:22 am
Here's my post on the petition, from March, though you can read all the filings here: [* * *] William Brewer, Sarah Rogers & Noah Peters of Brewer Attorneys & Counselors and I filed a petition earlier this month asking the Supreme Court to review the Second Circuit decision in NRA v. [read post]
