Search for: "PLIVA USA Inc"
Results 1 - 20
of 45
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2023, 2:38 pm
See PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:00 am
Ct. 1068 (2011);Pliva v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 3:00 am
As to fraudulent joinder argument, the defendants argued that the claims against McKesson were preempted under PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:42 pm
USA, Inc. v.West-Ward Pharm. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Isonas, Inc., 2014 WL 10988340 (C.D. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 9:59 pm
Patent No. 7,772,209, owned by Lilly, would be infringed by the ANDA products for which Defendants Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc.; Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.; APP Pharmaceuticals, LLC; Barr Laboratories, Inc.; and Pliva Hrvatska D.O.O. sought approval to market (opinion).... [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 1:06 pm
PLIVA USA, Inc., 2014 WL 4416085 (E.D.N.C. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am
Southern Electronics Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 1:26 pm
The prior published opinion in this case, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
PLIVA USA, Inc., 741 F.3d 470 (4th Cir. 2014). [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 9:22 am
Allergan USA, Inc., ___ F. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 12:54 pm
District Judge Tanya Walton Pratt concluded that Defendants Teva Parenteral Medicines, Inc. of Irvine, California; APP Pharmaceuticals, LLC of Schaumburg, Illinois; Pliva Hrvatska D.O.O. of Zagreb, Croatia; Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. of North Wales, Pennsylvania; and Barr Laboratories, Inc. of Montvale, New Jersey failed to prove invalidity of U.S. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
PLIVA, Inc., 720 F.3d 739, 744 (8th Cir. 2013); Bell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:15 pm
PLIVA, Inc. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
PLIVA, Inc. and Guarino v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 5:00 am
Allergan USA, Inc., ___ F. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 2:00 pm
PLIVA USA, Inc., ___ F.3d ___, 2014 WL 292700 (4th Cir. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 3:42 pm
Pliva USA, Inc., No. 12-30319, 2013 U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
PLIVA, Inc., 867 F. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
The Decherts are too involved in this litigation to comment publicly.There aren’t many research-oriented pharmaceutical companies based in Alabama, and after last week’s execrable decision in Wyeth, Inc. v. [read post]
